|
[이데일리 스타in 윤기백 기자] While the representative of singer Young-tak’s agency was accused of fraud, the performance agency who sued him insisted that “there was no return of the investment.”
On the 5th, Dion Communication, the performance agency, refuted that’Young Tak’s management company Milagro decided not to proceed with the work for various reasons, ended the work under agreement, and returned the full amount of the investment’.
Dioncom said, “After the conclusion of the Priority Negotiation Agreement on April 23, 2020, there has been no information on the cancellation of a single session other than the oral promise to write a formal concert contract, and the child’s revocation. “We haven’t had any consultations, and we haven’t even ended our business, but we have recently requested invalidation of the contract.”
“Millagro claims that it has returned 230 million won in the performance-related preferential negotiation contract and received a reimbursement certificate from Dioncom. It is a personal transaction-related’debt payment confirmation’ that was requested as necessary, but Dioncom has not received a dime of the preferential bargaining contract from Milagro.”
Dioncom also added, “A lawyer Cheonjiro Law Firm has been appointed, and the transcripts to support this and the preferred negotiation agreement written as’Creditor Dion Communication, debtor Milagro’ have been submitted to Seocho and Dongbu District Law.” .
Earlier, on the 4th of the agency Young-Tak, “It is true that we have discussed prior negotiations on performances with a company called Dioncom.” He added, “I returned the full amount of money that was paid from Dioncom, and received a reimbursement confirmation from Dioncom.” “In addition, all business processes were based on the contract written with Dioncom.”