View larger picture |
|
▲ On the morning of April 17, 2020, Jongno Police Station in Jongno-gu, Seoul, arrested “Buta” Kang-hoon, who was arrested on charges of participating in the production and distribution of sexual exploits by helping operator Jo Joo-bin in Telegram “Park Sabang” is being sent to the prosecution. | |
Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
View related photos |
Kang Hoon (nickname’Buta’), the second person in the Telegram chat room sexual exploitation, was sentenced to 15 years in prison.
The 31st Division of the Criminal Agreement of the Seoul Central District Court (Judge Cho Sung-pil) announced on the 21st that he was convicted of organizing and activating criminal organizations while sentenced to Kang. The court also refused to accept Kang Hoon’s allegations that he had acted as a doctoral room in response to threats from Jo Ju-bin, the main culprit in the case.
The court said, “At the time when Jo Joo-bin, Kang Hoon, and the blind man gathered around the end of September 2019 and began to systematically manage the doctoral room, a criminal group called the doctoral room was formed for the purpose of producing and distributing pornography for children and adolescents. I judge.”
The judiciary insists that “(Kang Hoon-eun) produced sexual exploitation video, forced harassment of victims, sexual abuse, coercion and intimidation were done by Jo Joo-bin himself, so that Kang Hoon did not participate at all. )”. They did not accept Kang’s argument. “At least, as for the motive of this case, Kang Hoon said, “Our court judges that Kang Hoon himself joined the criminal group in this case, not threatening Jo Joo Bin.
15 years in prison
The judge said, “Kang Hoon’s crime is a woman, especially a young woman.East·BlueBy sexually enslaving boys, they used them as objects of consumption, harassing women’s sexuality, and satisfying the wrong sexual desires of those who used doctoral rooms to establish a distorted sexual culture in a virtual space.”
“Because of the crime in this case, the identity of the victim is revealed in the internet virtual space, which is an anonymous space, and, according to Jo Joo-bin, the so-called sexual exploitation video produced by enslaving the victims is continuously produced and distributed, so when will the victims recover? Although the accused knew that Jo Joo-bin would threaten victims to produce and distribute sexual exploitation videos, the defendant managed the doctoral room from the time the doctoral room was opened, and Jo Joo-bin continued to use sexual exploitation videos. The guilt is very serious in that it can be produced and distributed, and has a significant influence on the crime in this case by posting advertisements to attract victims and concealing criminal proceeds.”
The judiciary committed a crime at the young age of 19 due to a sentence that was favorable to Kang. Correction and improvementI heard that there is no possibility of becoming.
The court sentenced Kang to 15 years in prison and ▲ completing a 40-hour sexual violence treatment program ▲ disclosure and notice of accused information for 5 years ▲ child and adolescent-related institutions, and restrictions on employment for five years at welfare facilities for the disabled. However, the prosecution’s request to attach electronic devices was dismissed.
Another accomplice Han was imprisoned for 11 years
Han Ahmugae, who worked together in the doctoral room, was also sentenced. The court sentenced Han to 11 years in prison. The judiciary admitted that Mr. Han joined after the doctor’s room was created, and did not admit the crime of organizing a criminal group, but only admitted to the crime of the activity of a criminal group.
The judiciary ended up trying to rape a 15-year-old victim, and for the crime of Mr. Han, who attempted to film and distribute the video, “The sexual self-determination of children and adolescents was violated for unspecified entertainment. It was considered an act that was violated at the level.”
The court also pointed out that Han produced pornography of three victims including children and adolescents, provided it to others without permission, and disseminated it, saying, “At least in the production, even if the children and adolescents agreed, there was no consent to the distribution.” did. He said, “The crime is serious as an act that gives irreparable damage to the victim’s honor.”