What is the satisfaction level of’Chin’ of a pharmaceutical company employee seen through the’blind’?

Donghwa and Sambaro scored the highest with 4.0 out of 5, and the lowest score was Hwanin 2.2
The main factor that divided the score was’Warabell’… Acclaimed by many companies with a score of 3.0 or higher

These days, many of the office workers share and communicate with each other through an anonymous community application (app)’blind’. Pharmaceutical companies are no exception. As it is a community that can only be signed up by company e-mail and is anonymous, the corporate reviews left by incumbents here are quite direct and reliable. On the 19th, Palm News compiled a blind review of the top 25 domestic pharmaceutical companies (based on cumulative sales in the third quarter of last year) to confirm the honest evaluation of domestic pharmaceutical companies.

Looking at the star rating first, among the top 25 pharmaceutical companies as of the day, only two companies, Dong Wha Pharm (4.0) and Samsung Biologics, received 4 or more out of 5 out of 5 in the blind corporate review. The companies that scored in the second half of 3 points were 6 companies including Celltrion (3.8 points), Yuhan Corporation (3.8), Dong-A ST (3.6), Boryeong Pharmaceutical (3.6), Ildong Pharmaceutical (3.5), and Handok (3.6). % Scored less than 3.5.

In the case of Dong Wha Pharm, which received the highest score, the so-called’work-life balance’ was good, and it was evaluated that annual use was free. The salary was also adequate, so it was evaluated as being okay overall. However, some pointed out that there is a lack of an owner-oriented corporate atmosphere and new drugs developed.

In the case of Samsung Biologics, which recorded the same score as Dong Wha Pharm, its name value as a subsidiary of Samsung, one of the largest companies in Korea, was regarded as the biggest advantage. Like an affiliate of a large corporation, the welfare is also considered as an advantage. However, it was also pointed out that there was a lot of work and the weakness of frequent personnel transfer.

Celltrion, which received the highest score after the two companies, was evaluated as good for employees who want to grow. There was a lot to learn, but there were a lot of evaluations that were unfortunate in terms of work. It is analyzed that such reviews have increased as the workload has recently increased with Corona 19 antibody treatment.

Yuhan Corporation, which received the same score as Celltrion, was cited as an advantage in terms of remuneration, stability, and external corporate image. However, there have been many reviews pointing out the conservative corporate culture as a weakness. There is little room for improvement in corporate culture.

The three companies, Dong-A ST, Boryeong Pharmaceutical, and Handok, which received 3.6 points side by side, were evaluated as having good Waraval. In the case of Dong-A ST, it was pointed out that the earnings pressure is not severe. In the case of Boryeong Pharmaceutical, it was well received in terms of wages and wages, and there were many mentions that the corporate culture was also improving. In the case of Handok, it received good marks for the autonomy of commuting due to the flexible work system and in-house welfare.

However, there were comments that Dong-A ST and Handok were not satisfied in terms of salaries, and Boryeong Pharm had mixed complaints about the in-house welfare and promotion system.

Ildong Pharmaceutical, which received a score of 3.5, was relatively free in terms of work-altitude, and was evaluated as satisfactory in annual salary and annual year. However, there were opinions that questioned the possibility of development, saying that a conservative corporate culture is preventing development.

In addition, Bukwang Pharm and Daehan New Pharm, which received 3.3 points, and Huzel and JW Life Science, who received 3.2 points, all received good scores in terms of’Woraval’. In the case of Daewon Pharmaceutical, which recorded 3.0 points, it was unfortunate in terms of corporate culture, but received reviews of good salaries and welfare.

Excluding Celltrion and Samsung Biologics, companies that generally received good evaluations for workability or in-house welfare scored high overall. On the other hand, in the case of the rest of the companies that recorded less than 3.0, there were many opinions that they were disappointed in terms of workability and welfare. Unlike in the past, it can be seen that workability and welfare have a significant impact on the job satisfaction of pharmaceutical companies.

In the case of Hanmi Pharm, which scored 2.9 points,’night shift’ was selected as the biggest factor that hinders the work. Even though they pay overtime pay, the company culture that takes overtime for granted hurts the workforce. In addition, the high starting salary is good for new employees, but it is not good for long-term work due to the low annual salary increase rate and incentive pay, and the fact that the military-style culture remains.

In the case of GC Green Cross, which scored 2.8 points, it is pointed out that although there is a work level, it is different for each department, and overall it is unfortunate in terms of salary and welfare. The conservative in-house culture was also cited as a weakness. Chong Kun Dang, who scored the same 2.8 points, is good to learn and grow in work, but many evaluated that the company culture is vertical and stays in the past. While there is a lot of pressure on performance, some say that employee welfare and incentive support are low.

Ilyang Pharm scored 2.7 points. In terms of salary, employees are given a certain amount of care, and the work level is also evaluated as possible, although it varies from department to department. However, it was pointed out as a weakness that there is a lot of politics in the company and the rigid corporate culture. In the case of Kyongsang Pharmaceutical, which recorded the same 2.7 points, the military-style in-house culture was cited as a problem. In addition, although the salary is adequate, there are opinions that it is difficult to get a work balance due to the large number of overtime and early work.

Huons, who scored 2.6 points, was criticized for being good at work, but poor salary. In the case of Waraval, there was also an opinion that it differs by department. In addition, the profit structure and owner-oriented management that depended on injections were also pointed out as problems.

In the case of Daewoong Pharmaceutical and JW Joongwa Pharmaceutical, which scored 2.4 points side by side, in-house welfare was considered a weakness. In the case of Daewoong Pharmaceutical, the advantages of guaranteeing parental leave and high annual salary, as well as low allowance and low autonomy for annual leave, were found. In the case of JW Pharmaceutical, it has the advantage of being able to take a vacation autonomously and to experience both in-hospital and external sales in terms of work, but there is also an opinion that there are difficulties in business due to lack of in-house welfare and stock management problems. Came out.

The companies that received the relatively lowest score were Kolmar B&H (2.3 points) and Hwanin Pharmaceutical (2.2 points). In the case of Kolmar B&H, the fact that the salary is good and the company’s sales are stable is regarded as an advantage, while the disadvantages of having a dispute between departments due to lack of system and lack of in-house welfare and work balance were also pointed out. Hwanin Pharm, which recorded the lowest point, was considered as an advantage in terms of salaries and incentives, but the disadvantages were that it was difficult to obtain a work balance due to the lack of support for R&D and the lack of support for R&D.

Source

Share this:

Related