On the 17th, the YouTube channel’GOAL TV’ uploaded a video titled’Rebuttal statement by lawyer Seopyeong Song Sang-yeop, the legal representative of player Ki Sung-yong, and the cultivation of D’.
Song Sang-yeop, lawyer of Seopyeong, the legal representative of Ki Sung-yong, said, “Yesterday, an allegation to the effect that Ki Sung-yong raped male junior players when he was in elementary school was broadcast. He said he remembered him and showed tears.
“Yesterday’s broadcast provided a biased perspective on what was true to the public with the tears of Mr. D, who is a victim. For yesterday’s broadcast, it provided the fostering of Mr. D, who was a victim, provided in this press release, but mostly broadcasts. It is not possible, so we provide balanced judgment data to the public.”
He said, “I will let the public hear the testimony of Mr. D’s own upbringing that he is the victim of exposing the truth while weeping on the broadcast so that the public can judge the truth of this situation.”
The voice file released by Ki Sung-yong through YouTube contains a recording file containing Mr. D’s upbringing. A person who is presumed to be Mr. D said that the incident report was misleading and said, “(Ki Seong-yong’s side council) has nothing to say. They said that they were writing a novel by themselves.
In addition, Mr. D’s direct junior high school junior Mr. E said, “I am close to the victim’s direct junior. I didn’t even have a face to face with Ki Sung-yong. I went to both sides to say that I tried to mediate as a soccer junior after seeing the media. It’s embarrassing to see them use my words as evidence. Even people who are victims use me too,” he said.
Ki Sung-yong argued, “Even though the other party knows that Mr. E’s words cannot be evidence, the other party should be criticized for presenting it as evidence.”
He said, “We avoid the opportunity to reveal the truth with one or another reason, and if time lag is not the purpose, we look forward to a responsible attitude of revealing the truth by immediately revealing’convincing evidence’ that the other party reveals the truth in front of the public.” “Because you have raised a national suspicion, everyone who wants the truth now wants to disclose the evidence. But I want to tell the public that the only one who will not make a lawsuit without knowing when the disclosure of evidence will end,” he said.
Lastly, he added, “A legal action to hold the other party’s legal responsibility will be raised within January 26, 2020.”