The flames of the workshop surrounding Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo’s move sprang to the wrong place. It seems that disputes between the opposition parties spread to the inside of the opposition.
Both candidates Na Gyeong-won and Oh Se-hoon, who are in a race for the people’s strength ahead of the Seoul Mayor’s by-election, raised their voices of criticism on the 8th at Ahn Chul-soo, the representative of the National Party. It seems to be a check against potential competitors in the unification of candidates for pan-conservative and opposition.
Na Gyeong-won “Ahn Chul-soo played a decisive role in the appointment of Kim Myung-soo”
Candidate Gyeong-won Na appeared on the YTN radio that day and said, “We were worried since the birth of Chief Justice Kim Myung-soo.” At that time, there were many concerns about Chief Justice Kim Myung-soo. In fact, at that time, the decision to agree on the appointment of Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo was passed. Boon was the National Party of Candidate Ahn Chul-soo.”
Candidate Na said, “At that time, the National Assembly Party drove about 30 votes, and it passed. Isn’t this situation really predictable?” and said, “Because you brought this situation and played hard as an opposition candidate, it was a very contradictory situation. He raised his voice, saying, “Look.”
On September 21, 2017, the motion to appoint the candidate of the Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo was passed at the National Assembly plenary session with 160 votes in favor, 134 votes against, 1 withdrawal and 3 invalid. Although it was an anonymous vote, it was a possible result because considerable votes were voted not only by the Democratic Party and the Justice Party, but also the People’s Party at the time.
Se-Hoon Oh “Is you piggybacking on your passport and opposition according to your reason?”
Candidate Se-hoon Oh also snipered Ahn Cheol-soo. Candidate Oh said in a Facebook post titled “What is Candidate Chul-soo Ahn’s identity?” “It is obvious that Candidate Chul-soo Ahn played a decisive role in the birth of Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo in 2017.” “At the time, Candidate Chul-Soo Ahn said,’Our (National House) lawmakers gave the decision for independence and reform of the judiciary’ when the motion for the appointment of the candidate Kim Myung-soo passed the National Assembly.”
Candidate Oh said, “Now, Candidate Chul-Soo Ahn said that Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo has no intention to defend the constitutional value of independence of the judiciary and judiciary.” “In 2017, the National Assembly Party, which had 40 seats at the time, agreed with the agreement to appoint Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo and showed a friendly move. As of 2021, the National Assembly Party with 3 seats is said to be opposition.”
He said, “Politics is responsible for consequences,” he said, saying, “Isn’t it necessary to reveal even a brief remorse based on a sense of responsibility while watching the independence of the courts shaken and collapsing after the inauguration of the Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo system?”
Kwon Eun-hee “Na Gyeong-won and Oh Se-hoon, blame for irrational others”
“The people think that the Supreme Court has betrayed the people’s beliefs for their own good,” said CEO Ahn Chul-soo at the party leadership meeting. “I hope you will stop doing things that are shameful to your juniors and blind to the people and decide where you will go.” Urged to resign.
However, as of the afternoon of the 8th, there has been no direct reaction to the attacks of candidates for the people’s strength. Instead, Rep. Kwon Eun-hee of the same party did not hide his unpleasant appearance. Rep. Kwon posted a post on his Facebook page entitled, “What are the qualifications of candidates Na Gyeong-won and Oh Se-hoon as a single candidate for the opposition party?”
He said, “I think that the National Assembly Party is a candidate who can check against the congestion and wartime of the Moon Jae-in administration with an alternative and that is supported by a large number of citizens (the qualification of a single candidate for the opposition party). It seems that he thinks he is a candidate who is good at blaming the irrational others. So it seems that he tries to overturn the mistake of Chief Justice Kim Myung-soo on Candidate Ahn Chul-soo.”
“The reason that Chief Justice Kim Myung-soo failed to protect the independence of the judiciary was a result of the qualifications of Chief Justice Kim Myung-soo and the tame of the Moon Jae-in administration to the judiciary, not because Candidate Chul-soo Ahn was the representative of the National Assembly at the time of the appointment of Supreme Court Chief Kim Myung-soo.” “At the time, the National Assembly representatives discussed and discussed expectations and concerns, and conducted a free ballot anonymously, centering on Kim Dong-cheol-won and the judiciary members who participated in the personnel hearing.” “Party Representative Ahn Chul-soo respected the discussions and discussions of the members of the House. It was a claim.
Also, “If the logic of Candidate Gyeong-won Na and Se-hoon Oh is that the citizens who supported the Democratic Party and President Moon Jae-in in the last general and presidential elections are responsible for the results, shouldn’t they support the opposition in this by-election? They don’t deserve to support the opposition? Are you scolding?” Rep. Kwon concluded, “I ask the two candidates of the people’s power to approach the problem and solution with a reasonable and common sense, and to treat all those who support the opposition in this by-election respectfully.”