The reason why Kim Doo-gwan shouted “impeachment” one day after another, saying “it is not realistic”

The reason why Kim Doo-gwan shouted “impeachment” one day after another, saying “it is not realistic”

Reporter Jeon Chang-hoon [email protected] 2020-12-27 17:13:47

Together with Democratic Party member Kim Doo-gwan.  Reporter Kim Jong-ho kimjh@

Together with Democratic Party member Kim Doo-gwan. Reporter Kim Jong-ho kimjh@

In addition, Democratic Party Rep. Kim Doo-gwan is shouting “Impeach Yun Suk-yeol” every day after the court’s decision to suspend disciplinary action by Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol.

The overall airflow in the party is negative, saying, “It’s realistically difficult, and only the headwinds grow”, but Congressman Kim is an attitude that he doesn’t care.

It is interpreted that Congressman Kim, who is aiming for the next presidential power, is trying to keep pace with the strong supporters of the pro-moon (Jae-in Chin), but there are not a few points that he may face headwinds with a move away from public opinion.

Rep. Kim said on Facebook on the 25th that this court decision was “a judicial coup that suspended the president’s power,” and said, “Impeach Yoon Seok-yeol, Kim Doo-gwan will take the lead.” To keep it,” he insisted on the impeachment again.

After the first impeachment remarks the day before, Party spokesman Heo Young said, “The impeachment may lead to dismissal by the Constitutional Court. “You have to control your emotions,” said former lawmaker Lee Seok-hyun, who served as vice chairman of the National Assembly, also said, “Because the constitutional judgment procedure is prudent, the reasons for impeachment will end with the expiration of the president’s term in the meantime.” Although the National Assembly has expressed a dissenting opinion that the separation of the prosecution’s power of investigation and the election of a conscious airlift chief is what the National Assembly will do as soon as possible,” Rep. Kim said, “If we do not impeach the prosecutor general, the culmination of the vested rights alliance, it is difficult to gain momentum for institutional reform. Is sticking to.

However, there is a possibility that the impeachment of President Yun was set by the Prosecutors and Disciplinary Committee of the Ministry of Justice as’two months of honesty’ rather than dismissal or dismissal before passing the gates of the Constitution. It is pointed out that it is extremely low.

According to the constitution and precedent, impeachment of a public official must result in a serious violation of the constitution or law, which constitutes dismissal.

Nevertheless, the prospect that if the passport enforces the impeachment proposal with a large number of seats in front of it, it is dominant that it will bring a tremendous headwind of public opinion.

In this regard, as a result of a survey of 500 adult men and women nationwide at the request of YTN by Real Meter on the 18th, when the punishment of President Yoon was in progress, 54.8% of respondents said, “It is unnecessary to resign from President Yoon.”

Former Kim Tae-seop, who left the Democratic Party, criticized Kim’s allegations of impeachment, saying, “The ruling party’s advocacy for impeachment is nothing but a sleazy tactic to get some points from the so-called strong supporters.” Rep. Jeong Jin-seok said, “What about impeachment while not being able to be honest for two months… “It was sarcastic.

Reporter Jeon Chang-hoon [email protected]

.Source