The Princess had billions of bloody earrings… British media anger global

Prince Meghan Markle wears an earring gift from Prince Mohammed bin Salman. [사진=유튜브 캡처]

The British media reported that Queen Markle wore a diamond earring worth billions of dollars as a gift from Saudi Arabia’s Deputy Prime Minister, Crown Prince Mohamed bin Salman, while the western world was shaken over the interview between Prince Harry and Queen Meghan Markle (pictured). They are criticizing every day.

The British media focused on this as it became known that the person who presented her earrings was Prince Bin Salman, who was known as the lead of the’dissident assassination case’, while it was uncomfortable for the British royal family to plant her in an interview with Prince Harry and his wife. And fell down.

“Prince Harry couple bomb declaration, the whole world awaits”

US CNN broadcast on the 7th (local time) “The whole world is waiting for the bomb declaration of the Prince Harry and the couple,” and “Millions of viewers are expecting enthusiastic,” he reported. This interview will air on the 8th.

The pre-recorded interview was conducted by Oprah Winfrey, the American’Queen of Talk Show,’ who made a relationship with Prince Harry and his wife. Winfrey helped in many ways, such as introducing a temporary residence to Prince Harry and his wife until they settled in Santa Barbara County, California, USA.

This interview attracted attention by amplifying the conflict between the British royal family and the Prince Harry couple before the broadcast. When it was observed that Queen Markle had been bullied by racism in an interview, British media reported suspicion that Queen Markle had been harassing the royal staff.

Accordingly, the royal family initiated a related investigation, and the Prince Harry and his wife refuted, saying that the suspicion had already been raised a few years ago to disprove the couple.

Britain’s leading press to beat Queen Markle

Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohamed bin Salman [사진=AP 연합뉴스]

Several local media outlets, such as British’The Times’ and’Telegraph’, recently took issue with the earrings that Queen Markle wore during her visit to Fiji in 2018. The reason is that the earrings were received as a wedding gift from Prince Vin Salman.

Earlier, on March 7, 2018, the British royal family greeted Crown Prince Bin Salman as state guest. Prince Bin Salman brought a special gift for Prince Harry and Queen Markle, who were about to marry, at the meeting of key figures in the British royal family. It was this earring.

The earrings were received by Queen Elizabeth II, not Queen Markle, as a gift from the British and Saudi Arabian royals at an official stand. According to the British royal guidelines, a gift received from a representative of another country on an official occasion is vested in the royal family and stipulated that it cannot be a private property of an individual. This means that Princess Markle must have permission from Queen Elizabeth in order to wear these earrings and must be known as an official announcement.

The problem occurred afterwards. On October 2, 2018, it was known that the Saudi Arabian journalist, Washington Post reporter and anti-government figure, Jamal Kashqji, led by Crown Prince Bin Salman, had been assassinated at the Saudi Arabian Consulate General in Istanbul, Turkey. From then on, the United States and the United Kingdom raised the human rights issue in Saudi Arabia in earnest.

Prince Markle, who married in May 2018 and officially became a member of the British royal family, sparked controversy using the earring in question at a formal dinner in Fiji three weeks after Kashukji was murdered on October 23, 2018. Even though there was an assassination led by Prince Vin Salman, from the point that the earrings were not appropriate for him to wear the earrings that were given to him, to the procedural problem that Queen Elizabeth would not have allowed them to wear the earrings, they were raised on the cutting board.

British media are accusing “she wears the’blood earrings’ she received from the dictator without hesitation,” and “and also took the obvious British royal assets without permission.”

Public opinion exhibitions in the UK and the US respectively

Prince Harry couple and Oprah Winfrey interview scene [사진=오프라 윈프리 트위터 캡처]

The reason why the controversy that erupted many years ago was recently reported in major British media is a strong’public opinion war’. The interpretation is convincing that the British royal family and Prince Harry and the couple, at the height of the conflict, continued their revelations in Britain and the United States, respectively, in order to slander each other.

The US CNN broadcast said, “The British media have speculated that there would have been a great discord with the royal family until the Prince Harry and his wife withdrew from the role of the royal family members,” he said. “This interview will provide an explanation for the story of the’court conspiracy’.” .

The Associated Press said, “At last, the time has come for the audience to hear the story behind the Prince Harry and his wife’s isolation from the royal life,” and “how you accept this story will depend on where viewers on both sides of the Atlantic are (among the United States and Britain).” Expected. Reuters reported that the interview could harm the British royal family.

The conflict between the British royal family and Prince Harry is expected to continue for the time being as the British media and the American media have created an atmosphere that conveys their positions on both sides.

Reporter Kang Kyung-joo [email protected]