The police officers who Jung-in had been given’three months of honesty’ in the case all objected

Police officers who were punished for insolvency investigation in’Jung-in case’

Request for reconsideration by the Office of Human Resources Development and Proposal Review Committee, claiming that the disposition is unfair.

All the police officers who had been disciplined in the 16-month-old adopted child Jung In’s abuse case (hereinafter referred to as Jung In-i’s case) for insolvent investigations disobeyed the disciplinary action.

According to the data submitted by Kwon Young-se, the Office of the People’s Power of the People’s Forces on the 19th, from the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency and the Ministry of Personnel Innovation, nine discipliners in the case disagreed with their disposition and requested a review from the Office of Personnel Innovation Protest.

The appeals review system is an administrative review system that reviews and decides when an objection is raised against disciplinary action or unfavorable disposition of public officials.

On the 8th of last month, the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency held a disciplinary committee against the five police officers who were dispatched to the scene and handled the report of the’Jung In-i case’. Subjects were 3 investigation teams and 2 child abuse police officers.

As a result of the disciplinary committee, on the 10th of last month, five people were sentenced to three months of suspension because they were acknowledged to be responsible for the initial response and the lack of coping with the investigation process.

In addition, the National Police Agency also held a disciplinary committee and issued a three-month suspension to one and two managers of the Yangcheon Police Station and reprimanded the chief. Reprimand is a kind of disciplinary punishment that scolds public officials, such as submitting a letter of dismissal, and repents of Tyler’s fault.

However, nine people involved in the’Jung Ini case’ who were disciplined filed a complaint review between February 20 and March 15, claiming that “the disciplinary action is unfair.” The Ministry of HR Innovation plans to review their appeals after May.

Rep. Kwon Young-se said, “I am concerned that the fact that the disciplinary police officers even filed a petition examination means’I will go away if I notice it and become quiet’.” .