Professor Lee “Is this what will happen in Korea?”
Mr. A, who is known as the maternal grandmother of a 3-year-old girl who died in Gumi, Gyeongsangbuk-do, was found to be his mother as a result of DNA testing, is entering the Daegu District Court’s Gimcheon Branch to receive an interrogation (substantial detention warrant) before arrest on the 11th. News 1
A (48), revealed as the mother of a 3-year-old girl found dead in Gumi, Gyeongsangbuk-do, denies not only the birth mother, but also the birth, and the case is falling into a labyrinth. In the midst of this, Professor Lee Soo-jeong of the Department of Crime Psychology at Gyeonggi University analyzed that “there is a high possibility that the couple (A) is lying to hide the missing child.”
Professor Lee appeared on the CBS radio’Kim Hyun-jung’s News Show’ on the 15th and said, “It is difficult to understand well whether this is an event that can happen in Korea right now.” Removed.
First of all, Professor Lee dismissed the possibility that the DNA test would be wrong, saying, “It can’t be wrong.” Professor Lee said, “Even once, the possibility of an error is almost zero at first. If you do that four times, you must see that Mr. A is the right mother.”
If Mr. A is the birth mother of the child who died, the question arises whether the husband of Mr. A, who lives with him, may not have known this. In response, Professor Lee argued, “I think it is very high (possibly a lie to say that my husband doesn’t know).”
Professor Lee said, “At the moment Mr. A came out of the police, I asked a few questions, but his attitude showed a strong attitude that he would cover up and hide. Is less reliable,” he pointed out.
Professor Lee continued, “Then, what is the reason why (this couple) have to lie to the end and cry out?” He said, “The reason why a child disappeared is not the daughter’s responsibility now, but maybe there are some questions about this couple.” did.
Soo-Jung Lee, Professor of Gyeonggi University. Central photo
“Maybe the changed child could be alive”
“I also think that maybe the (changed) child may be alive,” he said. “If the child died during childbirth, if the child died during childbirth, or because he was sick, you can talk about it. “Isn’t the child alive somewhere right now, or whether this couple is telling a ridiculous lie to hide all those processes?” he said.
As for the reason why Mr. A’s daughter, Mr. B (22), left the dead child at home alone, he speculated that “if he knew he wasn’t his daughter in the first place and raised him, it would be difficult to form an attachment.” Professor Lee said, “Because it is difficult to attach, I can even think that I just ran out. Then, what is the specific truth about my daughter’s statement? That topic is also very questionable.”
Regarding various’uncommon situations’, such as whether Mr. A had her sister raise her daughter and exchanged each other, and whether the couple could live together even after knowing the wife’s affair, Professor Lee said, “Within our common sense “If you try to understand it, you will never be able to explain it,” he said. “When there is a goal that the community should share everything and live together rather than any kind of relationship between mother and daughter, father and daughter, it may not be important to know who gave birth to whom. Will” he explained.
Professor Lee said, “Finding the missing child is probably essential to resolve this case, or to resolve a larger case involving these families,” said Professor Lee. I think I need to expand it,” he advised.
Gumi = Reporter Kim Jeong-seok
