President Yoo Young-min attended the National Assembly on the 24th and explained the whole words that Shin Hyun-soo, chief executive officer of the Blue House, expressed his appreciation. The people’s strength is scrutinizing the reporting and approval lines until the prosecution’s personnel are fulfilled, while the Democratic Party of the Republic of Korea dismisses it as’it is a problem because it has a problem.’ On that day, the National Assembly Steering Committee reviewed the responses of Director Yoo Young-min by issue.
“I regret” repeatedly in the wake of the wave of appreciation
Director Yoo Young-min said the first position in relation to the controversy was an apology, saying, “We regret.” It was just after Congressman Jeong Jeom-sik asked the first question on this controversy. Mr. Yoo replied, “First of all, I apologize for the fact that, after I gave the people fatigue (due to conflict) between the Ministry of Justice and the prosecution last year as the chief secretary for the recent situation.” Afterwards, when Rep. Chung Hee-yong pointed out that’to prevent the occurrence of a confusion in the state administration’, Mr. Yoo again apologized, saying, “I regret.”
The reason why Shin Hyun-soo, chief executive of Min Jeong, resigned
Why did Chief Shin resign? The suspicions raised so far have extended to the’passing theory of civil affairs’ that the Minister of Justice Park Bum-gye pushed for personnel without coordination with the chief of civil affairs, and the’passing theory of the president’, which announced the personnel even before President Moon Jae-in was given a chance. Director Yoo denied all allegations of’passing’. However, the relevance to the prosecutor’s personnel was acknowledged.
“There is something that the President asked for when he brought the Chief Min Jeong. ‘Have a smooth cooperative relationship’ was a big role given to Senior Min Jeong. In this greeting, of course, we have had a good cooperation relationship. However, in the stage of finalizing the personnel plan, it seems that there was a position in which Chief Min Jung wanted to finish it more neatly. From the perspective of the Ministry of Justice, I thought that it was sufficiently discussed at this level because the President was admitted at the request. In the meantime, I think from the standpoint of Chief Min Jeong that he may have been hurt by the leadership or trust in discussing personnel matters by assisting the president. As it appears in the media, I confirm that the fact that he passed even though he played the role of chief civil servant is only speculation and is not true.”
Yoo also said, “(Senior Shin) had the pain that it was very difficult for him to regain leadership or to play the role of coordinator and coordinator among the legal prosecutors.” “There was also a conversation about what to do to restore such leadership. We talked a lot, and seeing that Shin Hyun-soo has lived, it should be said that it is upright, but I think that also has an effect.”
Dismissing controversy over the settlement process, reluctance to report personnel
In short, there was no passing by Min Jeong-suk, but it is explained that Shin himself felt the limitations of leadership. Some media and people’s powers have been linked to the presidential passing theory. It is questionable what procedure led to Shin’s appreciation because the personnel proposal was reported and approval was made. The speculation that Shin, an aide to President Moon, would not have put a burden on the administration of the state just because his opinion was not reflected, also encouraged this.
According to Mr. Yoo, the prosecutor’s office’s personnel plan was announced on the 7th with prior approval from President Moon, and the appointment was made on the 9th after President Moon finished electronic approval on the 8th. Shin, who expressed his appreciation after the officials were official, submitted his resignation in document form on the 17th. Mr. Yoo said, “If the personnel are confirmed through consultation, there is a procedure for approval by the president. Upon approval, a presentation is made. After that, electronic approval is to be made, and it is disclosed to the HR Innovation Office. “The’approval’ was done before the announcement.” When the people’s power side repeatedly raised the’President Passing Theory’, Mr. Yoo said, “In the press, we raised a lot of (suspicious) about this matter, so as much as possible at the Blue House, we disclosed as much as possible. The approval was normally made before the announcement of the message at 1:30 pm on Sunday (7th).”
However, it was not disclosed who reported the personnel plan to the president. Regarding the reason for not revealing the personnel reporter, Mr. Yoo said, “I do not know the legal basis, but I recognize that as part of the President’s governing actions. I have usually done that.” Several times similar questions, Mr. Yoo said, “I cannot tell you who was approved by the president when and when.”
It was “shortened”, but there was no withdrawal or rejection
Chief Shin, who took a vacation on the 18th, returned on the 22nd and took over to President Moon. Senior Blue House officials described the incident as “shortened,” but Shin did not resign. Until now, President Moon has not revealed his intentions. “We will come to a conclusion sooner or later.” I am telling you that it is that much embarrassing.”
In the passport, it was argued that the controversy was’promoting trouble’. Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Yong-min said, “If you express your opinions excessively, it will be a problem because the opposition party is making a problem. He said, “There seems to be a lot of reports and independent reports that try to promote trouble while making things that are not a problem.”
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.