Passport split in’impeachment of President Yoon”concerns about headwinds…must focus on public welfare’

Former Spokesman Park Soo-Hyun, Vaccines and Public Health Important… Now’Lee Nak-yeon’s time’

Former Congressman Lee Seok-Hyun, 6th line “No stall..Possibility of dismissing constitutional material”

In addition, Democratic Party leader Kim Tae-nyeon is all speaking at the policy coordination meeting held in the National Assembly on the morning of the 24th. / Reporter Kwon Wook

When the allegation of impeachment of Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol was raised, mixed reactions were also coming out within the passport. Amidst the strong remarks of pro-Moon-related hard-line lawmakers day after day, some of the passports expressed concern about headwinds. In particular, the argument that it is time to focus on people’s livelihood rather than reform of the prosecutors’ prosecutors is expected to intensify the conflict within the party over the course of the passport in the future.

Rep. Kim Doo-gwan said on Facebook on the 25th, “I will prepare a proposal for impeachment of President Yoon at the National Assembly.” It was decided to watch the court’s decision due to the pressure of the surroundings, but we can’t wait any longer.” “It is nothing but a judicial coup that suspended the power of the president elected by the people. All constitutional means that can be mobilized must be mobilized.”

Some lawmakers immediately expressed their intention to join. Rep. Hwang Unha also said, “Yun Seok-yeol is the No. 1 presidential candidate in the opposition. If he abuses the investigative power under the logic of’the investigation of living power is the reform of the prosecution’ and continues to shake the government while performing practical political acts, it cannot be seen. Can come.”

However, there are voices in the Democratic Party that it is necessary to subside the heated atmosphere and shift the phase toward focusing on the public welfare issue.

Park Soo-hyun, who served as a spokesman for the Blue House, said, “My heart is full of dissatisfaction and remorse to the people and the President. In the end, reform is just like a’ringing gong’ without public sentiment.” In particular, Chairman Park said, “When analyzing the public opinion polls, the public does not equate the prosecution reform with the issue of Yoon Seok-yeol.” “The time was changed from’Chu Mi-ae’ to’Lee Nak-yeon’. It is necessary to institutionalize the’separation of the right to investigate and the right to prosecute’ and to relieve anxiety about the enlarged police. However, he emphasized that the most important things are’vaccines’ and’minseng’.

Lee Seok-hyun (6th election), who served as vice-chairman of the National Assembly, and former Democratic Party member of the Democratic Party also expressed their opposition, saying, “There are ruling party leaders claiming the impeachment of Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol.

Lee said on Facebook on the same day, “It can be the National Assembly, but the Constitutional Court is difficult.” “The request for impeachment of the President is resolved with 151 seats, the majority of the members of the National Assembly, so the current seats are sufficient. He pointed out that it is difficult to agree with Lee Sang.

He feared that “impeachment is a procedure for dismissing high-ranking officials, and the two months of suspension from the disciplinary committee of Justice Minister Chu Miae without dismissal or dismissal is a major obstacle to the decision to impeach.” Lee analyzed that “the constitutional trial procedure is cautious after the National Assembly procedure, so the grounds for impeachment will end with the expiration of the president’s term in the meantime.” He added, “It is the job of the National Assembly to separate the power of prosecution and to elect a conscious airlift chief rather than impeachment with a loud voice. / Reporter Park Jin-yong [email protected]

< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >

Source