|
View Larger Picture |
|
| ▲ Justice Minister Park Beom-gye attends the general meeting of the Legislative Judiciary Committee held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the 23rd to answer questions of lawmakers. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
Rep. Kim Do-eup: “The Minister of Justice is attempting to overturn the Supreme Court’s final decision made by the Supreme Court after hard work. Is this me? Is there anything else to do?”
Justice Minister Park Beom-gye: “The decision made by former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook and the issues raised by the inmates are different. Don’t even Kim Do-eup know well that even if a crime of perjury is established, it cannot be a reason for retrial?”
(…)
Park Joo-min and Democratic Party Member: “I don’t understand why Park accepted the conclusion of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office and the High Prosecutors’ Office. The Minister also said there was a procedural problem. It is very unfortunate, unfortunate, and frustrating for the Minister’s decision.
Beomgye Park: “The same is true for me.
On the 23rd, when the results of the investigation and command of the investigation and command of the’prosecutor’s suspected perjury’ in Han Myung-sook’s case by Justice Minister Park Beom-gye were divided into extreme and extreme reactions by the Legislative Justice Committee of the National Assembly. It was a debate that Minister Park accepted the conclusion of the Supreme Prosecutor General’s Prosecutor’s Office on the 22nd, but announced that he would expand inspection of the unfair investigation practices of the case and procedural issues in the inspection process. It won’t end roughly” http://omn.kr/1sjfi.)
Yoo Sang-beom “Why are you obsessed with this case?” …. Park Beom-gye “Answers to Congressman’s question”
The ruling party directly expressed regret for Park’s failure to’command the prosecution’, and the opposition party reaffirmed the offensive frame of’saving Han Myeong-sook’. The order of the joint prosecution against the Ministry of Justice and the Great Sword was labeled’Blackmail Blackmail’.
Minister Park stressed that the case should be approached separately to the opposition’s offensive. As the testimony of the two witnesses who were suspicious of perjury teachers during the trial could not be applied to prove Han’s guilty, he explained that even if the nature of the case was revealed, it could not lead to a retrial. The essence of the case lies in whether there was a manipulation of the testimony of the investigation team at the time, and it is a refutation that it is not’saving Han Myeong-sook’.
Nevertheless, the opposition party has repeatedly offensive after receiving a conviction of the former Prime Minister Han’s Supreme Court conviction. Rep. Kim Do-eup further brought the Supreme Court’s conviction, saying, “I don’t know well because I have a short career as a judge.” Rep. Yoo Sang-beom of the same party repeatedly asked, “Isn’t it correct to admit it to the Supreme Court?” There have also been accusations of “Inmates and Korean family members (Hanhong Yoon)” or “Loyal to the camp and supporters (Jewon Jang)”.
Rep. Yoo Sang-beom especially asked, “Neither of the witnesses (who were accused of perjury) were adopted as evidence of guilty, so why are you obsessed with this matter?” “There is an answer to Rep. Yoo’s words,” Park said. “It is not about finding a prime minister, but talking about the (wrong) investigation techniques of the prosecutors in charge of this case according to the contents of the inmates’ complaints.”
Apart from whether former Prime Minister Han was guilty or not, the point of the investigation team’s investigation method at the time was also described at the time of the Supreme Court ruling in August 2015. At the time, five of the 13 Supreme Court Justices stated in their dissenting opinion that “the evidence of the prosecutor’s improper efforts to ensure that Han Man-ho’s statement is not reversed is a strong issue.”
Minister Park also emphasized that the opposition’s criticism of the joint prosecutor’s office was “a matter that the Deputy Chief of the Supreme Prosecutor General, acting as an acting prosecutor general, also accepted.” Rep. Jang Je-won raised his voice, saying, “Then should the representatives get it?” “The great swordsman (at the time of the meeting) transcripts.
Beomgye Park,’Investigation Team Prosecutor’ attendance is “very serious”
|
View Larger Picture |
|
| ▲ Justice Minister Park Beom-gye attends the general meeting of the Legislative Judiciary Committee held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the 23rd to answer questions of lawmakers. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
Minister Park explained that the direction of the prosecution here is not on disciplinary action. “This prosecution is not aimed at punishing or disciplining anyone,” he said. “If there is any harm caused by the prosecution’s direct investigation, it is to diagnose it, improve the system, and improve the organizational culture.”
Furthermore, Park still expressed doubts about the substance and substance of the case. When Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Yong-min commented, “It is the core of the suspicion that the prosecution practiced a statement that is favorable to the structure built up by the prosecution,” Park said, “It is not possible to determine what purpose (perjury, etc.) It is correct that there was,” he said.
He criticized the process of calling prosecutor Eom Amugae of Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office, who is a prosecutor in charge of the investigation team and a suspected mother-in-law perjury teacher, to the meeting, saying, “I thought it was a very serious situation.”
Minister Park said, “Just by suddenly calling a prosecutor suspected of practicing testimony from the province without consultation with me is a measure that virtually neutralized the prosecution that Prosecutor Im (the subject of the prosecution investigation) has been doing.” He criticized that the meeting was self-evident just by having Prosecutor Um sit at the meeting in a situation where there was conviction that he would summon him as a suspect.”