Park Hye-soo’s “The content of the abuse claims changes every moment…Expanding the scope of the complaint” [전문]

Park Hye-soo (Photo = provided by affiliated company)

[이데일리 스타in 김가영 기자] Park Hye-soo’s agency, Studio Santa Claus, said in an official press release on the 4th that “the current claims of those who claim Park Hye-soo’s school violence are obviously false.” It also contradicts the words and actions of the past. As such, as long as the allegations of school violence are false, the statements of those involved in conforming to these false claims are also false.”

The agency side was grateful to Mr. B, who claimed to have suffered school violence by Park Hye-soo. He argued that he had even called and insisted that he even swear words. “However, many text messages sent to Park Hye-soo after the time of the assault that Mr. B allegedly did not have any content that could infer the fact of such assault at least.”

“Rather, Mr. B even sent a warning text message to Park Hye-soo, saying,’Don’t chew Hye-soo’ when Park Hye-soo did not respond to her contact in a timely manner.”

“It is common for the victim, B, to send a text message saying’Don’t chew’ to Park Hye-soo, the object of fear that he assaulted himself to the extent that he became bloody many times or participated in the assault, and he even called his father to swear words. It is difficult to understand even from common sense,” he raised the suspicion.

Photo = Data provided by Park Hye-soo’s agency

“B, through media interviews, argued that’the time of the assault was in 2010 (in the 3rd year of middle school), and the karaoke picture was about a year before the time of the assault (in 2009, in the 2nd year of middle school).’ “However, the picture was taken in 2010, and this is a matter that can be clearly confirmed through the details of the picture file. Therefore, it is clear that the contents of Mr. B’s interview with the media are false.”

In addition, Park Hye-soo was not in the karaoke room, the place where the assault was applied, and the shopping mall that the second assault was carried out does not exist on the site. “This fact clearly matches the testimony of the witnesses at the time.” In light of the statements of related witnesses, etc., it can be confirmed that Park Hye-soo has never been involved in any of the first and second incidents. Unlike the alleged content, the third incident’playground’ can be confirmed that the person who violated the assault was not Mr. Park Hye-soo, but the third person. This content clearly stated in the 3/4 interview that the victim of the assault was mentioned and that he was himself.”

The agency said, “B is constantly changing their claims based on the facts revealed through media reports, so the credibility of the claim is doubted.” It was pointed out that the level of damage and the content of claims are constantly changing with’group assault’ and’assault key’.

Photo = Data provided by Park Hye-soo’s agency

“We have already filed a complaint against major people who have posted false information, and an investigation is currently underway. In addition, various evidences, including evidence reported in the media, have been submitted to the investigative agency, and additional evidence that is being secured will also be submitted to the investigative agency. It is also planning to expand the scope of the complaint against those who have been. We will hold strict legal responsibility for false disclosures.” He repeatedly stressed that we once again ask for refrain from reckless speculation and slander without a reasonable basis. Previously, allegations of Park Hye-soo’s school violence were raised through the online community. Netizens, who are said to have been victimized by abuse, are claiming the damage through social media accounts and media interviews, and Park Hye-soo denies this and a truth battle is taking place.

Next before entering Studio Santa Clausdoor

Hi. Studio Santa Claus.

I would like to convey the official position of actor Park Hye-soo reported in the media.

1) Currently, the arguments of those who claim Park Hye-soo’s school violence are obviously false. Their arguments do not correspond with objective evidence, and even contradict their words and actions in the past. As such, as long as the allegations of school violence allegations are false, the statements of those involved in conforming these false claims are also false.

2) We disclose our position on the allegation of Mr. B, the main claimant of disclosure.

A) Mr. B claims that he was violated by Park Hye-soo in school and assaulted to become bloody several times while making the allegation of the damage, and that Mr. Park Hye-soo called Mr. B’s father and made swear words.

However, in the many text messages sent to Park Hye-soo after the point of the assault that Mr. B claims, there is no content that can infer the fact of the assault at all.

Rather, Mr. B even sent a warning text message to Park Hye-soo, saying, “Don’t chew Hye-soo,” when Park Hye-soo did not respond to her contact in a timely manner.

It is common for the victim, B, to send a text message, “Don’t chew,” to Park Hye-soo, the target of horror to the extent that he assaulted himself to the extent that he became bloody or participated in the assault several times and even called his father to swear words It’s hard to understand even from common sense.

B) Mr. B said through media interviews on March 4, 2021, “The time of the assault was in 2010 (in the 3rd year of junior high school), and the karaoke picture was about a year before the time of the assault (in 2009, in the 2nd year of junior high school) ) It’s a picture.”

However, the picture was taken in 2010, and this is a matter that can be clearly confirmed through the details of the picture file. Therefore, it is clear that the content of Mr. B’s interview with the media is false.

C) Also, as can be seen from the previously reported article and witness testimony, Park Hye-soo was not in the karaoke room at the time, and there is no shopping mall where the second assault was carried out. These facts are clearly consistent with the testimony of witnesses who were present at the time.

In the light of the reported articles and statements made by related witnesses, it can be seen that Park Hye-soo has never been involved in any of the first and second incidents. Unlike the alleged content, the 3rd incident’playground’ can be confirmed that the person who violated the violence was not Mr. Park Hye-soo, but the third person. This is clearly stated in the 3/4 interview that the victim of the assault was mentioned and that he was.

D) In ​​addition, Mr. B is constantly changing his claims based on the facts revealed through media reports, so the credibility of the claim is doubted.

In fact, the first claim for damage was that he was beaten by Park Hye-soo (2/22 SNS claim), but later,’group assault’ and’assault key’ (2/24 SNS/interview). Has been changed. But now, Park Hye-soo continues to change the argument as the cause of the assault (3/4 interview).

.3) The company has already filed a complaint against the major people who posted false information, and an investigation is currently underway. In addition, various evidences, including evidence reported in the media, have been submitted to the investigative agency, and additional evidence that is being secured will also be submitted to the investigative agency.

In addition, we plan to expand the scope of complaints against others who are alleging false facts again to justify false disclosures.

4) We will hold strict legal liability for false disclosures. In addition, we ask again to refrain from indiscriminate speculation and slander without a reasonable basis.

Thank you.