Park Hye-soo’s “Clear false allegations of harassment, will expand the scope of the complaint”[전문]

[매일경제 스타투데이 양소영 기자]

Actor Park Hye-soo reiterated his position regarding the allegations of school violence (hereinafter referred to as school violence).

On the 4th, Park Hye-soo’s agency’s studio Santa Claus said, “The claims of those who claim Park Hye-soo’s school violence are obviously false facts.” Revealed. The photographs were released, claiming that “as long as the allegations of school violence allegations are false, the statements of those who meet these false claims are also false.”

Regarding Mr. B, the alleged disclosure, the agency claimed that “while making this claim, he was subjected to school violence from Park Hye-soo, and that he was assaulted to become bloody several times, and Park Hye-su called his father and even insulted him.” “However, in the many text messages sent to Park Hye-soo after the point of the assault that Mr. B claims, there is no content that can infer the fact of the assault at least.”

“Rather, Mr. B even sent a warning text message to Park Hye-soo, saying,’Don’t chew Hye-soo’ when Park Hye-soo did not respond to her contact in a timely manner. He raised the suspicion that it is difficult to understand, even in general sense, that Mr. B, the victim, sends a text message to Park Hye-soo, the object of fear that he even calls his father to swear words.

Park Hye-soo’s management company said, “The time when the assault occurred was in 2010 (in the 3rd year of junior high school), and the karaoke picture was about a year before the time of the assault (in 2009, in the 2nd year of junior high school).” Insisted. However, the picture was taken in 2010, and this is a matter that can be clearly confirmed through the details of the picture file. Therefore, it is clear that the contents of Mr. B’s interview with the media are false.”

The agency reiterated that Park Hye-soo was not in the karaoke room at the time, and that the shopping mall that the second assault was carried out did not exist on the scene, as can be seen in the article reported through the media and the witness testimony. It also explained that it clearly matches the testimony of witnesses at the time.

He said, “Mr. B is constantly changing their claims based on the facts revealed through media reports, so the credibility of the claim is doubted.” “In fact, the content of the first damage claim was beaten by Park Hye-soo (2 /22 SNS claim), but later, the level of damage and the content of the claim changed to’group assault’ and’assault key’ (on SNS/interview on February 24). Then, at the moment, Park Hye-soo is continuing to change the argument as the cause of the assault (3/4 interview).”

The agency said, “We have filed a complaint against major people who have already posted false information, and an investigation is currently underway. Various evidences, including evidence reported in the media, have been submitted to the investigative agency, and additional evidence that is being secured will also be submitted to the investigative agency. Also, it will expand the scope of the complaint.” He announced that he would hold strict legal responsibility for false disclosures.

Recently, Park Hye-soo was accused of being a perpetrator of school violence. At the so-called’victim meeting’, he repeatedly expressed his official position, saying, “I wish you a sincere apology.” In this regard, Park Hye-soo’s studio, Santa Claus Entertainment, announced a legal response, saying that it was “a false fact.” On the 23rd, he filed a complaint. The truth battles of both sides are ongoing. The KBS drama’Dear M’starring Park Hye-soo is in the state of acting for the first broadcast.

The following is the full text of Park’s position

I would like to convey the official position of actor Park Hye-soo reported in the media.

1) Currently, the arguments of those who claim Park Hye-soo’s school violence are obviously false. Their arguments do not correspond with objective evidence, and even contradict their words and actions in the past. As such, as long as the allegations of school violence allegations are false, the statements of those involved in conforming these false claims are also false.

2) We disclose our position on the allegation of Mr. B, the main claimant of disclosure.

A) Mr. B claims that he was violated by Park Hye-soo in school and assaulted to become bloody several times while making the allegation of the damage, and that Mr. Park Hye-soo called Mr. B’s father and made swear words.

However, in the many text messages sent to Park Hye-soo after the point of the assault that Mr. B claims, there is no content that can infer the fact of the assault at all.

Rather, Mr. B even sent a warning text message to Park Hye-soo, saying, “Don’t chew Hye-soo,” when Park Hye-soo did not respond to her contact in a timely manner.

It is common for the victim, B, to send a text message, “Don’t chew,” to Park Hye-soo, the target of horror to the extent that he assaulted himself to the extent that he became bloody or participated in the assault several times and even called his father to swear words It’s hard to understand even from common sense.

B) Mr. B said through media interviews on March 4, 2021, “The time of the assault was in 2010 (in the 3rd year of junior high school), and the karaoke picture was about a year before the time of the assault (in 2009, in the 2nd year of junior high school) ) It’s a picture.”

However, the picture was taken in 2010, and this is a matter that can be clearly confirmed through the details of the picture file. Therefore, it is clear that the content of Mr. B’s interview with the media is false.

C) Also, as can be seen from the previously reported article and witness testimony, Park Hye-soo was not in the karaoke room at the time, and there is no shopping mall where the second assault was carried out. These facts are clearly consistent with the testimony of witnesses who were present at the time.

In the light of the reported articles and statements made by related witnesses, it can be seen that Park Hye-soo has never been involved in any of the first and second incidents. Unlike the alleged content, the 3rd incident’playground’ can be confirmed that the person who violated the violence was not Mr. Park Hye-soo, but the third person. This is clearly stated in the 3/4 interview that the victim of the assault was mentioned and that he was.

D) In ​​addition, Mr. B is constantly changing his claims based on the facts revealed through media reports, so the credibility of the claim is doubted.

In fact, the first claim for damage was that he was beaten by Park Hye-soo (2/22 SNS claim), but later,’group assault’ and’assault key’ (2/24 SNS/interview). Has been changed. Then, currently, Park Hye-soo continues to change the argument as the cause of the assault (3/4 interview).

3) The company has already filed a complaint against the major people who posted false information, and an investigation is currently underway. In addition, various evidences, including evidence reported in the media, have been submitted to the investigative agency, and additional evidence that is being secured will also be submitted to the investigative agency.

In addition, we plan to expand the scope of complaints against others who are alleging false facts again to justify false disclosures.

4) We will hold strict legal liability for false disclosures. In addition, we ask again to refrain from indiscriminate speculation and slander without a reasonable basis.

Thank you.

[email protected]

[ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]