Park Hye-soo denied again allegations of abuse

Park Hye-su/Photo = Choi Hyeok

Actor Park Hye-soo once again denied the allegations of school violence (abusive) and foreshadowed a strong legal response.

On the 4th, Park Hye-soo’s agency, Studio Santa Claus, said in an official position, “Park Hye-soo’s claims of school violence are clearly false. Their claims do not correspond to objective evidence, and even contradict their past words and actions. As such, as long as the allegations of school violence are false, the statements of those who meet these false claims are also false.”

Following that, the agency revealed its position on the allegation of B, the author of the posting, and said, “Mr. B was assaulted by Park Hye-Soo and was assaulted to become bloody several times while making the allegation of the damage this time. “However, many text messages sent to Park Hye-soo after the time of the assault that Mr. B claimed did not contain any information that could infer the fact of the assault. Rather, Mr. B is Park Hye-soo. “Don’t chew Hye-su” to Park Hye-soo when he did not respond to his contact in a timely manner, he said.

In addition, Park Hye-soo said, “The time when the assault occurred was in 2010 (in the 3rd year of middle school), and the karaoke picture was about a year before the time of the assault (in 2009, in the 2nd year of junior high school), which Mr. B claimed through a media interview. He argued that “the picture was taken in 2010, and this is a matter that can be clearly confirmed through the details of the picture file. Therefore, it is clear that the contents of the media interview of Mr. B are false.”

Still, “Park Hye-soo was not in the karaoke room at the time, and the shopping mall that the second assault was carried out does not exist on the scene. It can be confirmed that Park Hye-soo had never been involved in any of the first and second cases. The third incident’playground’ Again, contrary to the claimed content, we can confirm that the person who violated the assault is not Park Hye-soo, but a third person.”

In addition, Park Hye-soo pointed out that Mr. B’s claim is questionable. According to the agency, the first damage was actually beaten by Park Hye-soo (2/22 SNS claim), but afterwards, the level of damage and the content of the claim were “group assault” and “assault key” (2/24 SNS/interview). It was changed from time to time, and now Park Hye-soo is constantly changing the argument in the way that the cause of the assault (3/4 interview).

The agency finally said, “We have already filed a complaint against major people who posted false information, and the investigation is underway. To justify the false disclosure, we have expanded the scope of the complaint against others who are claiming false information again to justify the false disclosure. He said, “We will hold strict legal responsibility for false disclosures. In addition, we will once again request the restraint of reckless speculation and slander without a reasonable basis.”

▼ The following is the official position of the studio Santa Claus Entertainment.

1) Currently, the arguments of those who claim Park Hye-soo’s school violence are obviously false. Their arguments do not correspond with objective evidence, and even contradict their words and actions in the past. As such, as long as the allegations of school violence allegations are false, the statements of those involved in conforming these false claims are also false.

2) We disclose our position on the allegation of Mr. B, the main claimant of disclosure.

A) Mr. B claims that he was violated by Park Hye-soo in school and assaulted to become bloody several times while making the allegation of the damage, and that Mr. Park Hye-soo called Mr. B’s father and made swear words.

However, in the many text messages sent to Park Hye-soo after the point of the assault that Mr. B claims, there is no content that can infer the fact of the assault at all.

Rather, Mr. B even sent a warning text message to Park Hye-soo, saying, “Do not chew Hye-soo,” when Park Hye-soo did not respond to her contact in a timely manner.

It is common for the victim, B, to send a text message, “Don’t chew,” to Park Hye-soo, the target of horror, who assaulted himself to the extent that he became bloody many times or participated in the assault, and even called his father to swear words. It’s hard to understand even from common sense.

B) Mr. B said through media interviews on March 4, 2021, “The time of the assault was in 2010 (in the 3rd year of junior high school), and the karaoke picture was about a year before the time of the assault (in 2009, in the 2nd year of junior high school) ) It’s a picture.”

However, the picture was taken in 2010, and this is a matter that can be clearly confirmed through the details of the picture file. Therefore, it is clear that the content of Mr. B’s interview with the media is false.

C) Also, as can be seen from the previously reported article and witness testimony, Park Hye-soo was not in the karaoke room at the time, and there is no shopping mall where the second assault was carried out. These facts are clearly consistent with the testimony of witnesses who were present at the time.

In the light of the reported articles and statements made by related witnesses, it can be seen that Park Hye-soo has never been involved in any of the first and second incidents. Unlike the alleged content, the 3rd incident’playground’ can be confirmed that the person who violated the violence was not Mr. Park Hye-soo, but the third person. This is clearly stated in the 3/4 interview that the victim of the assault was mentioned and that he was.

D) In ​​addition, Mr. B is constantly changing his claims based on the facts revealed through media reports, so the credibility of the claim is doubted.

In fact, the first claim for damage was that he was beaten by Park Hye-soo (2/22 SNS claim), but later,’group assault’ and’assault key’ (2/24 SNS/interview). Has been changed. Then, currently, Park Hye-soo continues to change the argument as the cause of the assault (3/4 interview).

3) The company has already filed a complaint against the major people who posted false information, and an investigation is currently underway. In addition, various evidences, including evidence reported in the media, have been submitted to the investigative agency, and additional evidence that is being secured will also be submitted to the investigative agency.

In addition, we plan to expand the scope of complaints against others who are alleging false facts again to justify false disclosures.

4) We will hold strict legal liability for false disclosures. In addition, we ask again to refrain from indiscriminate speculation and slander without a reasonable basis.

Thank you.

Jang Ji-min, guest reporter at Hankyung.com [email protected]