|
View larger picture |
|
| ▲ Shin Hwan Shin (from left), Eunhee Cho, Gyeongwon Na, and Se-Hoon Oh are posing at a joint discussion of four candidates for the Channel A People’s Power Seoul Mayor contest held at DDMC in Sangam-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul on the afternoon of the 26th. | |
| Ⓒ National Company Promotion Foundation |
See related photos |
It was a battle with sparks. The Power of the People The Contest of Preliminary Candidates for the Seoul Metropolitan Mayor’s By-election The joint vision debate was more intense than ever, as the rumors between the four candidates went back and forth.
It was thanks to the format in which all four people participated in one table, unlike the last three confrontation discussions held by grouping two candidates one-on-one. As the debate heated up, the time for the candidates, who had originally been scheduled for two minutes each, had to cut down to one minute.
In particular, the appearance of the concentration of workshops toward candidates Oh Se-hoon and Na Gyeong-won, who are forming the’Yanggang’ composition of the contest, was produced several times.
Oh Se-hoon, the administrative capital has also changed its position related to the transfer?
On this day, Candidate Se-Hoon Oh suffered controversy over’changing words’ several times. Candidate Eun-hee Cho recalled that Oh’s remarks about the relocation of the administrative capital in the past, “It is worth taking a closer look.” It was asked whether the position on the relocation of the administrative capital or the relocation of the National Assembly to Sejong City was changed from that time. He exclaimed, “Answer yes or no within 30 seconds. Do you think we should post a referendum?”
Candidate Oh tried to change the answer, saying, “I asked for opinions. There is also a method of polling,” but candidate Cho’s attack continued. In the end, Candidate Oh said, “I don’t remember. I have never said that it was a referendum.” It’s a whole thing…” Candidate Cho criticized him, saying, “The memory seems to be vague, but the citizens of Seoul do not want it.”
Candidate Oh mentioned that the public opinion of Seoul citizens was higher in the recent public opinion poll on the relocation of the National Assembly to Sejong City. “I replied. Then, Candidate Jo also criticized, “When going to the presidential election, it would be good to move to the Chungcheong area, conscious of the Chungcheong vote. Now, let’s review the referendum, and now it is a bleak position to ask citizens’ opinions again when it becomes the mayor.”
Na Gyeong-won “Oh Se-hoon, I don’t talk about my philosophy for an important issue”
Candidate Kyung-won Na also attacked again with the same purpose. When asked, “Is it changed or not?” Candidate Oh said, “If you say that, there is no way to answer, and I think Seoul should be the oldest.” “It is not a situation that deserves a national referendum or a referendum, and we will ask the opinions of Seoul citizens and arrange their positions according to the majority opinion,” he added.
Candidate Na pointed out, “Obviously, in the (media) interview, I talked about referendum several times, but in fact, he always said the same thing about important decisions last time.” He then criticized “Queer Festival, is it right or wrong to be held at Gwanghwamun?” Then he said, “I oppose discrimination”, but never say whether it will be held or not.” “I stir talking about my philosophy in an important part, but how do I lead Seoul in the midst of a crisis?”
Candidate Oh said, “I told you that the queer festival should definitely consider the position of minorities.” But, there is a committee on the issue of using Gwanghwamun Square or Seoul Square. There are also regulations. It is decided by the committee, not the mayor. I emphasized again, “originally. “By asking for my personal opinion, I said they admitted and respected their differences,” he added. In addition, he said, “I keep talking about the relocation of the capital, but it is very difficult in the provinces.”
Na Gyeong-won “Why am I Gang Gyeong-su” vs. Se-Hoon Oh “Na Kyung-won said that there was no substance in the middle.”
Candidate Kyung-won Na was in a shape of striving for a one-on-one confrontation with Candidate Se-hoon Oh. In particular, he sensitively accepted the point that he was’strongly conservative’ and his’moderate expansion power’ was poor, and he spent considerable time refuting this. However, not all of them were effective, such as being “backed back” in the process of fighting.
Candidate Na is the latest BBS Radio <박경수의 아침저널>I took issue with Candidate Oh’s remarks who appeared in. It was a remark that if candidate Na Kyung-won becomes a candidate for the Mayor of the People’s Power of Seoul, it would be difficult to unify with candidate Ahn Cheol-soo. When Candidate Na asked “What’s the purpose?” Candidate Oh said, “If you look at the context, you can see that it is a misunderstanding.” No, he said that it is difficult to beat Candidate Ahn Chul-soo if it becomes unified.”
When Candidate Na asked again, “In what sense is it difficult to beat Candidate Chul-Soo Ahn?”, Candidate Oh criticized “I said that I was conservative while talking about jajangmyeon and champon.” It is a reminder that Candidate Na has made remarks in various media interviews, such as “If champon is left, then Jjajang is right” and “Middle way is Jjajang is poured champon.” Candidate Na said, “Just because I talked about it, I’m talking very dichotomously as Kang Kyung Conservative,” and he said “old dichotomy”.
“I am a conservative politician,” said Candidate Na. “I am close to principles when it comes to philosophy and beliefs, but I am ready to listen to anyone’s opinion and borrow anyone’s head.” He protested rather than’Kangkyung Conservative’, referring to the fact that he met former Dongyang University professor Jin Joong-kwon or that he recruited former Minister of Information and Communication Jin Dae-je to the election camp.
Candidate Oh said, “It’s because he said, “I don’t know what’s in the middle,”‘I don’t know what’s real,’ and “I don’t know what’s in the middle.” It means that it is difficult.” He also emphasized that “my belief is to warmly care for the difficult people, and to make warm rewards for the middle-right that harmonizes with them.”
Na Gyeong-won, Oh Se-hoon’s remarks are misunderstood and wrong, but one minute burns out
A similar happening was repeated in the second half. Candidate Oh brought out a graphic panel showing the difference between equality and fairness during his final initiative discussion. It was a panel I had already used several times. Candidate Oh said, “Our party is not a party for those who have it, but has a vision of promoting business activities, creating jobs, and developing the country.”
The moment he tried to continue the explanation, Candidate Na gained the right to speak by writing his last right of rebuttal. Candidate Na explained briefly about his over-the-counter struggle and his achievements as an in-hospital representative, saying, “Candidate Oh has always called me a’strong conservative’, and the reasons for talking about this are changing more and more.” “The longevity who ran away in 2011 is a blame for the longevity fighting,” he also criticized Oh.
When the last minute of Candidate Na was over, Candidate Oh said, “It wasn’t at all the subject I’m going to talk about, but I think there’s a deep misunderstanding. I want to tell you about the misunderstandings our party has.”
Candidate Oh spent time explaining the basic direction of the safe income policy he pursued and the plan to implement a pilot, and then, “I tried to listen to comments one by one, but candidate Na Kyung-won just used that opportunity for other purposes. He said, “Candidates Cho Eun-hee and Oh Shin-hwan are different about this experiment.” As a result, the opportunity to decorate the ending of the final initiative debate just before the closing remarks was spent on the wrong side.
The power of the people ends the discussion between candidates after the vision debate on this day, and the final candidate is decided through a 100% public opinion poll from March 2 to 3. The announcement is on March 4.