Professor Jeong Gyeong-shim of Dongyang University, who is accused of private equity and irregularities in the entrance examination of children, was arrested in court at the first trial trial held at the Seoul Central District Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul on the afternoon of the 23rd. I will appeal.” Senior reporter Kim Bong-gyu [email protected]
※ Click the image to see it larger.
■ “I was convicted only of circumstances”
One of the ruling party’s main arguments was that it was convicted solely of suspicion without proper evidence.
◎Kim Jong-min, Democratic Party Member / 24th <문화방송>(MBC)’Kim Jong-bae’s attention’
–“In a controversial situation, he was convicted under the circumstances of suspicion.”
◎Hong Ik-pyo, Representative of the Democratic Party of Korea / 24th <한국방송>(KBS)’Kim Kyung-rae’s strongest current affair’
-“When it was discussed in court, the (citation) could not be made using the following Hangul. In fact, the prosecution couldn’t prove it at all.” -“When all officials of the Busan National University testified in court, the citation said that the citation did not affect the court at all” -“The decision of the judge while ignoring the stories of the references and witnesses in the trial was centered on the trial It was a mistaken judgment against attention.”
Kim Jong-min, a Democratic Party member, said on the radio broadcast on the 24th, “In a controversial situation, he was convicted on the basis of suspicion.” Democratic Party lawmaker Hong Ik-pyo also appeared on the radio broadcast that day, saying, “I think it may be a very bad precedent in which the prejudices, predictions, and certain prejudices of the judiciary have worked quite a bit on various facts and such things.” Rep. Hong said, “When it was discussed in court, it was not possible to make (citation) using the following Korean language. In fact, the prosecution could not prove it at all.” “When the officials of the Busan National University medical team testified in court, the citation said that the citation did not affect them at all. What the judge decided while ignoring the stories of the witnesses and witnesses presented in the trial was a wrong judgment that directly opposed the trial-centeredism.” He added. In the course of Professor Jeong’s trial Prosecutors demonstrate the process of forgery of the Tong Yang University citationI have a bar. The ruling party lawmakers claim that the demonstration failed, but the judge admitted that the citation was forged as the prosecution decided that the demonstration had no problem. In addition, the judiciary saw that the forged Tongyang University citation had an effect on the admissions of the Busan National University medical team. Actually, in 2015, Cho’s daughter, Cho Min, entered Professor Amoogae Kim, who was responsible for document evaluation at Pusan National UniversityAcknowledged that the results of awards that can be submitted for admission at the time were limited to data of awards at the level of the president or minister or higher, and asked the prosecutor’s office to ask, “Can the awards be affected by the interview as the only evaluation data?” Esau can do that.” In the explanatory data on the 23rd, the judiciary in the case of Professor Jeong explained in detail the reason why it judged that the Tong Yang University citation was false and that it had an effect on the acceptance of the Busan University medical team.
◎ Forgery of Dongyang University citation
-Prosecutors used a printer at the court on the 32nd and 33rd trial dates, and on the listing sheet provided by Tongyang University, the'(form) listing created in the process of forging the citation of the president of Tongyang University[1]It was proved that it was possible to print out the citation with a home printer as it printed the .hwt’ file, and it was judged that the defendant knew that the extra listing paper was stored in the cabinet of the office of the language education institute. -A key part of the prosecution that the defendant forged the citation of the president of Tongyang University is whether the ‘Sunghae Choi, president of Dongyang University’ and the stamp of the president at the bottom of the citation of the president of Tongyang University are derived from (son) Cho’s first award certificate file, The rest of the description is only a detailed description of the crime method, so if the creation of the seal of the president is acknowledged, the result of the evidence investigation results in the creation of the’seal of the president.jpg’ file in some way different from the fact of the prosecution, or the seal of the president. jpg’ file Some lack of proof of specific process and methodEven so, the above charges can be convicted.
◎Pusan University Medical School Admissions
-Since most of the applicants who applied for the 2015 Pusan National University medical team’s screening for domestic university graduates did not receive a citation beyond the university president, the citation in the name of the president of Dongyang University was a positive factor in evaluating the documents for Jo Min. -If Jo-min did not include the award of the Tong Yang University president’s citation on the application and self-introduction, and did not submit a forged Tong Yang University president’s citation, there is a possibility that he would have been eliminated from the first stage screening process due to a low score in the document evaluation. If he had not entered the President’s Citation Award, Jomin would not have received a high score in the personality area, and the difference between Jomin’s final score and the 16th place that did not pass the final score is only 1.16, so the award of the Tong Yang University President’s Citation Without it, there is a high possibility that Jomin will not be able to pass the Busan National University medical practitioner.
The judge admitted that it was proved through demonstrations by the prosecution that the part of the presidential seal at the bottom of the daughter Cho’s citation of Tongyang University was obtained from the file of her son Jo Amugae’s highest award of Tongyang University. As this fact was proved, the judiciary decided that it would not be a big problem in determining that the citation was forged, even if the method in which the’President’s Seal.jpg’ file was created is not confirmed in detail. In addition to this, the judge said, “The (forged) Tongyang University president’s citation contains the resident registration number next to Jomin’s name, but the other awards and certificates of Tongyang University do not include the resident registration number of the winner or the graduate.”, “(forged) the president of Tongyang University The citation was considered a forgery for reasons such as “the location of the serial number and the format of the listing number are different” between the citation and other certificates or certificates of Tong Yang University. Professor Chung claimed that “the first citation, the citation from the president of Tongyang University, and the original files of the photographed photo files were all lost”, but the court said that the claim was “unbelievable”. The judiciary also admitted that the falsely written Tongyang University citation had an effect on the admission of medical staff to Busan University.
On September 6, last year, during the personnel hearing of the candidate Cho Kook, the then-independent member of the lawmaker Park Ji-won is checking the photograph of the citation of the daughter of candidate Cho. Capture Waitien screen
■ “The sentence is too much”
Democratic party lawmakers were sentenced to four years in prison The sentence is excessiveSay.
◎Jin Seong-jun, a Democratic Party member / 24th <와이티엔>(YTN)’Hwang Bo-seon’s departure new morning’
–“It turned out to be innocent of public money embezzlement, which was actually considered a felony, but I think that it is a very trivial citation forgery, whether it is a matter that can be sentenced to a medium sentence of four years each with such a thing, or that it is too much in terms of sentencing.”
◎Yoon Young-chan, a member of the Democratic Party / 23rd <페이스북>
-“Even if the citation and forgery of the internship certificate are true, it is a court arrest for four years in prison” -“If it were not the wife of the former Minister of Korea, would the court have made such a harsh ruling?” On behalf of many parents, did Professor Kyung-Shim Jung erase the cross?”
Democratic Party lawmaker Jin Seong-joon pointed out on the radio broadcast on the 24th, “A very minor citation forged, is it a matter that can be sentenced to a medium sentence of 4 years each with this?” Democratic Party lawmaker Yoon Young-chan also said on his Facebook page on the 23rd, “Even if the citation and internship certificate are forged, it is legal restraint for four years in prison.” “On behalf of many parents in this land who risked their lives on the specifications of their children at that time, Did you erase the cross?” he wrote. It is the logic that sentencing is unfair. But the judge Explained that he was sentenced to four years in prison because of a very bad offense.did. The court judged that the guilt was heavy for not only forgery of the Tong Yang University citation and other entrance examination irregularities, but also for violating the Public Officials Ethics Act and making stock transactions using undisclosed important information under a new name and concealing criminal proceeds. The court did not reflect only adverse sentencing factors in the sentence. The fact that there was no record of punishment in the past and the fact that the money earned through such actions was small was judged in favor of Professor Jeong.
◎ Reason for sentencing
-The defendant used his and her husband’s social status to obtain an internship confirmation with false information from acquaintances, etc., with the aim of making Jo-min appear more faithful and capable than other applicants, and some of the items to be entered were issued. It was altered to the content that was favorable to Chomin without the permission of the authorities, and later committed a crime of forging the citation of the president of Tong Yang University, which stated that she received a citation for volunteer activities that Jomin did not perform. In view of the motives of the crimes related to the admissions irregularities from the college entrance examination to the admissions examination for all members of this case, the crimes of the crimes are not very good in light of the methods of crimes that have gradually become concrete and bold to achieve such purpose. -Even if we compare the strict punishment demands of our society for cases related to entrance examination irregularities and the sentences of similar cases, severe punishment is inevitable for crimes related to entrance examination irregularities committed by the accused. -The defendant is the wife of his motherland, a high-ranking public official, and despite the legal obligation to faithfully respond to property reports in accordance with the Public Officials Ethics Act, the defendant borrows an account in the name of another person for the purpose of increasing the property of himself and his family and trades stocks using undisclosed important information. , Committed illegal activities such as concealing criminal proceeds. These crimes by the accused not only incapacitate the property reporting system and blank trust system stipulated by the Public Officials Ethics Act, but in particular, the transparency of property growth demanded by our society for high-ranking public officials, and objective performance of public offices without conflict of interests between the public and private interests. He attempted to evade requests for, and was forced to evaluate not only the criticism of the inappropriateness of conduct but also the guilt. -However, the defendant has not been punished for any crimes such as forgery of documents, the exercise of forgery documents or other crimes, and the actual gains that the defendant gained from the crimes related to Korink PE are crimes as the stock price of WFM stocks fell after the defendant acquired them. Much less than what was stated in WFM stocks were finally traded on the open market as of September 23, 2020, and the closing price was KRW 1175.
Professor Kyung-Shim Chung, who has been handed over to the trial on charges such as corruption in his child’s entrance examination and suspicion of private equity investment, is attending the first trial trial held at the Seoul Central District Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul on the afternoon of the 23rd. Senior reporter Kim Bong-gyu [email protected]
■ “There was no judicial control over the prosecution’s overinvestigation”
One of the points criticized by the ruling party is that the court did not properly control the prosecution’s overinvestigation. On July 3, when former Minister Cho attended a trial on his own abuse of authority and obstruction of exercise of rights, “the only institution that can control the abuse of the prosecution’s authority and protect the human rights of citizens is the court. It is in the same context as he said, “I sincerely hope that the court will faithfully fulfill this role.”
◎Kim Jong-min, a Democratic Party member / 24th <문화방송>(MBC)’Kim Jong-bae’s attention’
–“The prosecution’s investigation has been carried out as an overinvestigation, but the democratic control agency for the prosecution is the court.” In the process, the task of judicial control over the prosecution was not properly fulfilled.”
◎Kim Yong-min, Democratic Party Member / 23rd <페이스북>
-“The problems of the prosecution prosecution are seen only by the public.” -“The court must control the infringement and prosecution, but today it seems to have given up its role.”
Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Jong-min said on a radio broadcast on the 24th that “the judicial control task for the prosecution was not properly fulfilled during the trial process.” Rep. Kim Yong-min of the same party the day before wrote, “The court has to control illegal investigation and prosecution, but today it seems to have given up its role.” Professor Chung’s lawyers have also argued that the prosecution abused the right to prosecute and illegally collected various evidence. However, the judge did not accept all of the lawyer’s claims.
□ Among the explanatory materials of the court
On September 6, last year, the prosecution charged Professor Jeong on charges such as forgery of private documents, and then conducted additional investigations and filed a request for a change of the complaint to the court. However, the court did not accept it, saying the main contents of the prosecution had changed significantly. Then, the prosecution indicted Professor Chung. Professor Jeong’s lawyer is like this Double prosecutionAsserted that the prosecution was abuse of the prosecution’s right to prosecute However, the court judged that it was not a double prosecution, saying, “It is difficult to recognize the identity of the facts in the case of the prosecution. The court has already pleaded not guilty to the case that the prosecution first charged. Regarding the collection of illegal evidence, the judiciary pointed out that there were some procedural problems only with the electronic information extracted from the computer in the lecturer’s lounge at Tong Yang University. The electronic information detailed list was not given to the computer administrator without a justifiable reason, and what was issued after 5 months is contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, the judge said, “Excluding the evidence capability of the lecturer’s lounge computer only because of the above procedure defects will result in contrary to the realization of criminal justice through the harmonization of the principles of due process and the actual truth determination.” Recognized ability. Although there were some problems procedurally, it was judged that the evidence was collected illegally and that it was not a defect at a level where the evidence ability could not be recognized. By Jeong Hwan-bong, staff reporter [email protected]