Motherland’Yoon Seok-yeol’ prosecution’dead or dying’ power-biting hyena’

“Yun Seok-yeol judges the Moon Jae-in government as the power to die”

“Institutional reform should continue”… Order to complete inspection

viewer

On the 7th, former Justice Minister Cho Kook strongly criticized former Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol on the 7th, saying, “In Korean history, most prosecutors in power investigations were investigating hyenas for biting’dead power’ or’power to die’ soon.”

On this day, former Minister Cho posted an article titled’Criticism of Living Power Investigation (Kwon-su)’ on his social network service (SNS), and said,’Funds of the Fatherland’ and’Power-type corruption’ through a joint venture between Gum-on-Jung and others. He said, “I am in a situation where I am in a situation where I am in a situation where I am in a situation where I am awaiting punishment because my neck is stuffed with a knife and shackles on my ankles after being hit by the attack, but I want to say this.” “Since the second half of 2019,’prosecutors’ or’prosecutors’ (檢察敎徒) inside and outside the prosecution, including former prosecutor general Yoon Seok-yeol, have argued that’living power investigations are real prosecution reforms’. He pointed out that he has been opposed to all institutional reforms, such as the establishment of new prosecutors, adjustment of the right to investigate the prosecution, and the separation of investigation and prosecution.” He said, “First, during the authoritarian regime or after political democratization, when the Blue House explicitly intervened in the investigation, the prosecution never unfolded the theory of’Kwonsu to kill’.”

He said, “The’living power’ that drives the reform of the prosecution without intervening in the investigation-such a power in Korean history was the progressive government-the target of the’killing Kwon-soo’,” he said. Did not stop. Under the Moon Jae-in administration, the prosecution requested an arrest warrant for the three ministers.” “In other words, the minister’s intervention in the personnel of the affiliates after the change of power (Kim Eun-kyung), the discretionary judgment of the chief civil servant on the action after the end of the inspection (the motherland), the decision of the minister’s policy on the shutdown of the nuclear power plant (Bae Woon-gyu), etc. Of course, the Blue House did not stop this.” “The conservative opposition under the progressive government is also’power’, and the prosecution, wielding the double swords of the right to investigate and the right to prosecute, is also’power’, but they are not the target of’Kwon-soo to kill’. Therefore, unless the evidence is widespread and the investigation is inevitable, it is excluded from all-intensive investigations.” In particular, he pointed out, “Because the conservative opposition party is a political alliance that prevents the reform of the prosecution, a quick and powerful investigation into their corruption will not be conducted.” did. He added, “The prosecutor general’s investigation of corruption in the family is neglected or delayed because there is a concern that it would undermine the status and authority of the head of the organization.

Of course, former Minister Cho pointed out, “You cannot criticize Kwon-soo to kill himself,” but pointed out that “the motive, purpose, technique, and behavior of Kwon-soo should be subject to criticism.” He said, “Before the expression of “killing of fine dust” and “investigation of Indian rains” cannot be justified, both techniques and behaviors cannot be justified. “Before the expression of killing kwonsoo, under the Roh Moo-hyun administration, a representative example of a killing kwon soo. National Prosecutor’s Office’ Ahn Dae-hee, the head of the heavy water department, for the presidential election fund investigation, since the second half of 2019, has not been criticized by the public, unlike prosecutor Yoon Seok-yeol’s murder Kwon-soo. The second investigation led by President Ahn Dae-hee and Yoon Seok-yeol was different.”

Former Minister Cho said, “In Korean history, most prosecutors have investigated hyenas that bite’dead power’ or’power to die’ in power investigations.” Rather, it was judged as a “power to die soon” and decided to change direction.” He criticized that “for Yun Seok-yeol, the protection of the prosecution’s organization was more important than the’Candlelight Revolution’,” and that “geomchi (檢治) was superior to’democratic’.” “This is the reason for the transformation from’hero’ to’anti-hero’ and from’government official’ to’politician’.” MBC on September 8, 2020 In the second part of the’Prosecutor’s Special Investigation’ broadcast, said the incumbent prosecutor who interviewed anonymously. The incumbent prosecutor who responded to the interview at the time said, “Daeyoon (Suk-yeol Yoon) and the people around him seem convinced that the future united party will be the majority in this general election. If that happens, we can overturn the airlift bill or things like this again, and then we have the impeachment in mind until last year or January of this year.” Regarding this, former Minister Cho added, “As you know, the prosecution’s judgment was misleading,” he added. “This is because there were candlelight citizens who strongly opposed the abuse of the prosecution’s power and pursued reforms by the prosecution.”

Lastly, former Minister Cho said, “The theory of killing rights is only a target investigation of political bias, that is, the shell of’selective justice,’ and the prosecution’s organizational protection logic to evade or defeat the prosecution reform.” The institutional reforms to prevent the recurrence of the government should continue,” he ordered the completion of the prosecution’s complete deprivation of the prosecution’s right to investigate.

/ Reporter Song Jong-ho [email protected]

< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >