Media reported by the general citizens as’Cho Doo-soon at the mart’

The media read the post on a community stating that’A child sex offender Jo Doo-soon was sighted at a mart’ without confirming the facts. Even in the post, which is not true, a photo of a couple who is presumed to be his wife and a person other than Jo Doo-soon was uploaded, and the article was written with the photo.

The Ministry of Justice said in the media today on the 2nd, “This is not at all true. Some media just dictated the stories on the Internet.” The Gyeonggi Ansan Danwon Police Station announced to the media on the morning of the 2nd that the person in the photo was not Cho Doo-soon. The police said, “Cho Doo-soon has not been out within the last three months. “Cho Doo-soon is under probation, so when he goes out, the police check the movement, and the dedicated probation officer checks whether he goes out and observes his movements.”

▲ The Seoul Shinmun reported the first unconfirmed article related to Cho Doo-soon, and wrote three cases.  Photo = Naver page screen capture.
▲ The Seoul Shinmun reported the first unconfirmed article related to Cho Doo-soon, and wrote three cases. Photo = Naver page screen capture.

In the photo of the article, Mr. A, who is believed to be the son-in-law of the couple, also posted a post in a community on the morning of the 2nd. Mr. A said, “First of all, the person in the picture is not the Cho Doo-soon couple. This is our father-in-law, mother-in-law, who has been working all his life and retires and spends comfortably after retirement. My husband and I have been living for a year, and they have a drink for us. The hat you are wearing is the one I bought, and the yellow Adidas sneakers I also bought.”

Mr. A continued, “The artisan adult is raising his hair saying that he will try to lengthen his hair that he could not do while working. Now my mother-in-law has a trembling heart and a trembling hand, so she doesn’t know what to do. “It’s embarrassing to start with the community and don’t even check information.

The first media reported seems to be the Seoul Newspaper. The Seoul newspaper said, “Soju, electronic anklet… Jo Doo-soon appeared in a real-time mart. [현장]In the article titled “”, an article about witnessing Jo Doo-soon (69), a child rape, came up with a photo. On the 1st, an online community posted a picture with the title of’It appeared at the Cho Doo-soon Mart in real time’. The photo shows an old couple in front of a cashier in a large supermarket. The white-haired man, who is presumed to be Jo Doo-soon, is looking at the receipt while wearing a hat and mask.”

The Seoul newspaper explained, “The author explained that’I can see an electronic anklet’. In the actual picture, the ankle was seen as an electronic anklet. In particular, it was not something to eat in the cart that caught the eye. There was a whole box of soju in the cart. The author pointed out the alcohol in the cart and criticized it, saying,’I think I’m less alert to seeing I drink alcohol even after being released from prison.’

after “[현장] ‘Cho Doo-soon appeared at the mart’… ‘Buy a box of soju in an electronic anklet garage’” (MBN), “Cho Doo-soon witnessed’Buy a box of soju at a mart with my wife’… ‘I’m not sober’” (Money Today), “I went to the Cho Doo-soon mart. Did I buy alcohol with an electronic anklet?” (Financial News), “Is my tax the price of Cho Doo-soon drink?” Citizens”Affliction’” (Asian Economy), “Cho Doo-soon buys a box of soju at a hypermarket… Articles such as “Anxiety and Anxiety” of netizens have been posted.

▲ There were about 2,000 comments on the MBN article reported on Daum Portal.
▲ There were about 2,000 comments on the MBN article that was reported on the portal Daum without confirmation of the facts.

In the case of MBN articles, many people have read after the portal. There were 4,000 responses to the article and more than 2,000 comments. Currently, MBN deleted the article and re-published an article stating that it was Happening. After that, even the article that it was Happening was deleted. Media Today, I tried to contact the editor-in-chief of the Seoul Shinmun and the director of the MBN news agency, but they could not reach it.

Netizens related to the article, “If not, what are those two people in the photo? That way, the story of portrait rights infringement comes out. Are you saying that if those two people sue, you will pay for it?” “They just use Jo Doo-soon to make money for themselves,” “Don’t post a little falsehood.

Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.


Source