Let’s criticize Moon Jae-in’s remarks about’child returns’… Party Office (General)

Cheong Wa Dae “There is no consciousness of’returning children’ in the intention of the President.”

Democratic Party “President Moon’s remarks, mentioning the prior commission system”

However, in the clarification of the Party Office, the adoption group raised’greater concern’.

The Democratic Party along with the Blue House began to evolve as criticism against President Moon Jae-in’s remarks at the New Year’s press conference on the 18th of his “adoption cancellation” remarks intensified one after another. President Moon said at a New Year press conference held at the Cheongwadae Chunchugwan on that day, when the second Jung-in asked for a preventive measure, “Because adoptive parents may change their minds, they are not willing to cancel the adoption again within a certain period of time, or to still adopt. Although it is strong, it was controversial when he said, “I hope that the relevant ministries will take measures to protect the adopted child, such as changing the child, such as when it does not fit with the adopted child.” Expressions such as’cancellation of adoption’ or’changing children’ became a problem.

Blue House Spokesman Kang Min-seok/ Yonhap News

■ Blue House “There is no consciousness of’returning children’ in the intention of the president

The Blue House spokesman Kang Min-suk refuted the previous day (19th), saying, “There is no intention of the President or the consciousness of’returning children’ in the head. Spokesman Kang said, “If you want to adopt, you cannot adopt a child from the next day.” In the case of France, if the marriage is agreed, the child is protected for more than 6 months. Not only a few countries, but all countries operate such a system, and there is a system in Korea,” he explained. He added, “(At the opposition party), there was a harsh expression for returning goods to children,” he added. “If you look at the entire context of yesterday’s speech, you could have understood it a bit, but I am a bit disappointed.”

Hong Ik-pyo, Democratic Party Member/Yonhap News

■ Democratic Party “President Moon’s remarks, mentioning the prior entrustment system”

Hong Ik-pyo, chairman of the Democratic Party’s Policy Committee, said, “There was a part of the interview with President Moon Jae-in yesterday that the exact intention was not well conveyed.” “The pre-consignment system has been routinely used in Korea with the consent of adoptive parents. I will actively review it.” Chairman Hong said, “It is a system that protects children and helps stable adoption through monitoring, follow-up, and evaluation by entrusting prospective adoptive children to the families of prospective parents for six months before adoption.” “President Moon preemptively detected child abuse yesterday. As the emphasis was placed on immediate separation and expansion of protective measures after the discovery of abuse, we will try to achieve complementary legislation in response to this.”

Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Doo-gwan also insisted on the criticism that “send the saint house”. Rep. Kim said, “The opposition forces are encouraging confusion in state affairs only by splitting and twisting some of the President’s words at once.” Rep. Kim said, “It is very regrettable that the opposition party ignores the president’s sincerity and bites and hangs over just a word. The president’s words are true that we should eliminate the abuse of adopted children.”

President Moon Jae-in answers a reporter’s question at a New Year’s press conference held at the Cheongwadae Chunchu Hall on the 18th./Yonhap News

■ However, in the clarification of the Party Office, the adoption group raised’greater concerns’.

However, despite the clarifications of the Blue House and the Democratic Party, domestic adoption groups responded coldly. Still, there is still a lack of explanation for the connection between the situation and adoption measures. They are concerned that it is read that the abuse of their adoptive parents toward Jeong In-i was caused by an incomplete adoption system. In addition, this explanation of the Blue House and the ruling party has room to be interpreted as a means that the sum of the adoptive parents and Jeong In-i did not match. The National Federation of Adopted Family members held a press conference in front of the National Assembly on this day and said, “The Blue House made an clarification that’the purpose of the cancellation of adoption, which the President proposed as a solution to the case, supplements the pre-entrustment protection system’. He criticized him as an expression that could never be possible if the person concerned was considered.”
/ Reporter Hyein Lee [email protected]

< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >

Source