Lee Seong-yoon’s counterattack … Re-investigate the suspicion of Yoon Seok-yeol’s mother-in-law’s memorial park

The prosecution requested the police to supplement and investigate the allegations of the privation of the memorial park business rights related to Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol’s mother-in-law. The police sent the prosecution to the prosecution with an opinion of non-prosecution regarding the accusation case, but a re-investigation proceeded due to the prosecution’s request for a complementary investigation.

The Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office 3rd Criminal Division (Director Heo In-seok) said on December 18 last year that the police commanded a complementary investigation on the case related to the memorial park by the mother-in-law Choi Mo (75), the mother-in-law of Yoon Song. Since then, the prosecution changed the command to request on the 8th of last month as the prosecutor’s office began to adjust the power of prosecutors and policemen.

The case began when Nomo accused the National Police Agency of taking control of the memorial park in Yangju, Gyeonggi Province in January last year by Kim Mo, who is known to be a close friend of the mother-in-law Choi. Mr. Roh said that Mr. Choi and Mr. Kim dismissed themselves by forging shares of the memorial park developer and took away their business rights.

The police called Roh on the 27th of last month to investigate further in response to the prosecution’s request for a supplementary investigation. However, even inside the police, there are observations that “it is difficult to change the direction of the investigation by re-investigation.”

Previously, the mother-in-law Choi was charged with creating and using fake bank balance certificates in the process of purchasing Seongnam-si land (forgery of private documents, Uijeongbu District Prosecution) and of illegally receiving medical care benefits by establishing an illegal nursing hospital in Paju, Gyeonggi-do (violation of the Medical Law, Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office). ), respectively, have been handed over to trial.

Some analysts say that the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, Lee Seong-yoon, who had a lot of bad things, such as calling for a replacement ahead of the prosecutor-level personnel on the 7th and mentioning Kim Hak’s illegal withdrawal investigation to the prosecution’s summons. Comes out. This is because the passport continued to demand investigation of the mother-in-law.

It is also noteworthy that the 3rd Department of Criminals requested a complementary investigation from the police and in fact initiated a re-investigation. This is because Heo In-seok, the third chief of detectives, was a prominent candidate who was mentioned as the first chief of detectives instead of the first chief of detectives Byun Pil-gun, who rebelled against the prosecutor’s office on the 22nd in the midst of the prosecution.

Heo is also close to Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office, Shim Jae-cheol, a representative’anti-yoon’ within the prosecution. In 2015, when Chief Prosecutor Shim served as the Superintendent of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office, when Chief Prosecutor Shim served as the 1st Deputy Chief of the Southern District Prosecutor’s Office in 2019, there was a kite who took a breath as the 5th detectives chief.

Recently, there was a controversy over a case requested by a civic group for being involved in the case of Jeong Woon-ho, the representative of Nature Republic, which was investigated when Shim was the head of the stern in 2015-2016, and a case requested by a civic group for investigation.

The ruling party has also consistently insisted that the mother-in-law Choi should be severely punished, criticizing President Yoon Suk-yeol. Kim Doo-gwan, a member of the Democratic Party, said in November last year, “In the case of forgery of bankbooks by President Yoon’s mother-in-law is like the citation case of Tong Yang University, and investigations involving the case of Mr. Yoon’s stock price manipulation are like the suspicion of investing in a private equity fund by Professor Kyung-Shim Chung, neutrality and fairness can be brought to the mouth. “You can do it,” he said. “Generally, Yun, who is trying to bury other people’s family members, buried them and bury them, has already disqualified.”

In addition, pro-passport officials, such as Professor Woo Hee-jong of Seoul National University Veterinary University, who served as the proportional party of the Democratic Party and co-representative of the Citizen’s Party, and Kim Min-woong, professor of Kyung Hee University, who was the chairman of the “White Paper of Motherland” promotion committee, issued a petition calling for an investigation into President Yoon’s mother-in-law, etc.

Former Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae also laughed at a question about Yoon’s mother-in-law at the National Assembly, saying, “I have never seen (President Yoon’s) willingness to investigate.”

Reporter Kim Soo-min [email protected]