viewer
In relation to the situation where controversy is heating up in politics, such as sharply clashing opinions against and against the ‘pardonism of former presidents Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye,’ proposed by Democratic Party representative Lee Nak-yeon Lee argued that “(Representative Lee) definitely saw (public opinion)”.
The former Supreme Commissioner Lee appeared on the KBS radio’Kim Kyung-rae’s Strongest Current Affairs’, which was broadcast on the 4th, and emphasized, saying, “The party representative grasped public opinion under the rapport to reduce the political burden of the President and the Blue House.”
At the same time, former Supreme Commissioner Lee said, “It is strange that the person who emphasizes the meaning of such strictness would have made such a remark regardless of the Blue House.” did.
Former Supreme Commissioner Lee also said, “Right now, supporters in the Democratic Party are strongly opposed. He pointed out the situation, saying, “So, I think we basically discussed it,” he said, saying, “It would be an act that would have no advantage for this floor if we did this without rapport with the Blue House.
In addition, former Supreme Commissioner Lee pointed out that “it sounds very lightly because the intention is political, because of the people’s unity,” and then raised the day, “Isn’t it a card for elections ahead of the by-election.”
Meanwhile, the Democratic Party decided to follow the intentions of the party members, saying, “The reflection of the parties is important” regarding Lee’s “amnesty of former Presidents Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye,” who shook the new year.
viewer
The Democratic Party reported that it held a private meeting with the Supreme Council in the National Assembly on the 3rd and gathered their will.
In this regard, Chief Spokesman Choi In-ho said, “We agreed to agree on the importance of public consensus and the reflection of the parties on this issue, and to respect the will of the people and the party members in the future.” “The highest ranks support reform and integration with the candlelight spirit. I sympathized with the promotion together.”
At the same time, Spokesman Choi said, “I understood that it originated from the loyalty for the unification of the people” regarding Lee’s remarks, “I will propose to President Moon Jae-in the amnesty of the two former presidents at an appropriate time.”
It seems that the Democratic Party leadership presented the reflection of the two former presidents as a condition for de facto pardon. Representative Lee has virtually retreated from the strong opposition inside the passport against the amnesty in that he did not make any premise in mentioning his amnesty.
On the same day, CEO Lee met with reporters after a meeting of the Supreme Court on the same day, and was asked, “Do you have an apology to make a suggestion for pardon?” He said, “It is said that (reflection) is important (in the party announcement).” He said he would wait for the ruling of the President’s reconsideration.
Representative Lee continued, “I spoke out of my loyalty that I believe that we must go beyond the politics of the camp of antagonism and confrontation and develop into a politics that achieves national unity.”
At the same time, CEO Lee replied “some of them” to the following question,’Is the method of national integration through amnesty?’ In addition, he drew a line saying, “No such thing,” to the question,’Did you communicate with the Blue House on the suggestion of amnesty?’ / Reporter Kim Kyung-hoon [email protected]
< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >