Lee Eon-ju and Park Hyeong-jun “personal attack” overheating… Park Seong-hoon and Park Min-sik’s’Work Pledge’ Workshop
People’s Power Busan Mayor’s Contest
Reporter Ahn Joon-young [email protected], Reporter Lee Eun-cheol [email protected]
Input: 2021-02-15 19:51:08Revision: 2021-02-15 19:52:22Published: 2021-02-15 19:52:53 (p. 03)
Prior to the first debate on the preliminary candidates for the 4/7 Busan mayoral by-election held at Busan MBC on the afternoon of the 15th, the candidates are vowing for propaganda. From the left, Park Sung-hoon, Lee Eon-ju, Park Min-sik, Park Hyeong-jun. Reporter Kim Kyung-hyun view@
The first’one-on-one debate’ was held on the 15th for candidates Park Seong-hun-Park Min-sik and Lee Eon-ju-Park Hyeong-jun on the 15th to elect the final candidates for the 4/7 Busan mayoral election. The discussion meeting held at Busan MBC was broadcast live on TV.
Park Min-sik “How to achieve corporate attraction?
Effective support for venture companies and start-ups”
——————————
Seong-Hoon Park “Consultation under water
Political engineering unity is the opposite”
Seonghun Park vs. Minsik Park
In the confrontational debate between Park Sung-hoon and Park Min-sik, who advocate’young mayor of Busan’, a fierce battle took place over the possibility of realizing the pledge of a youth job proposed by the other candidate. Overall, it was a match that stood out for Park Sung-hoon’s ambition and Park Min-sik’s experience.
Candidate Seong-hoon Park said, “We will create employment effects for 30,000 people by attracting three Samsung affiliates within one year, including Samsung Electronics and Samsung Electro-Mechanics and Samsung Engineering in Yeongdo.” In response, candidate Park Min-sik said, “It would be a great welcome, but I don’t know how to attract companies in detail.” “Attracting large companies is useless unless they are directly connected to youth jobs. It can be more effective to provide customized support to venture companies or startups so that young people can have dreams.” Candidate Park Seong-hoon said, “We met with senior officials of Samsung affiliates in person and talked to some extent through discussions under water.”
Neurological warfare also took place against the unification of candidates. Candidate Min-sik Park asked the reason for being aesthetically hostile to unification, saying, “Isn’t (preliminary candidate Park Sung-hoon) watching too much?” Candidate Park Seong-hoon said, “Unification must have a justification. I have never thought of artificial and political engineering unity.” After that, candidate Park Seong-hoon took over the Busan City Economic Control Tower and made a lot of achievements. I confronted it.
Lee Eon-ju “Gadeok New Airport
Lee Myung-bak, Chung Moo-seok, the Blue House”
—————————-
Hyungjun Park “Youth Overseas Employment Academy
Policy of not holding on to young people and letting them go”
Hyungjun Park vs. Eonju Lee
The power of the people Park Hyung-jun and Lee Eon-ju, who are running first and second in the Busan Mayor’s candidate fitness survey, also fought a fierce confrontation on this day. Candidate Lee was the first attacker. Candidate Lee attacked the fact that Park was formerly the chief political officer of the Blue House during the Lee Myung-bak administration, when the Gadeok New Airport was abandoned. He launched an offensive, saying, “(After the Lee Myung-bak administration’s decision to cancel the Gaduk New Airport), candidate Park said through a media interview that it means’it’s meaningful to change the wrong policy direction’. In response, Candidate Park said, “At that time, we fought one to four (Busan vs. Gyeongnam, Ulsan, Gyeongbuk, and Daegu) over the location of the new airport in the southeast region. He expressed his determination that it would be better to do it.”
Subsequently, Candidate Park took a counterattack, citing Lee’s pledge to promote overseas employment by means of short-term intensive language education in connection with local universities and embassies in each target country. Candidate Park criticized him, saying, “We have to let the youth come back and stay, but this is a policy to let them go.” Then candidate Lee refuted, “If you have good quality jobs in other countries, you should send them overseas.” Unlike the first part debate between Park Seong-hoon and Park Min-sik, the second part showed overheating, with candidates interrupting each other’s comments. The two candidates responded somewhat intensely, such as “Why do you stop talking?” “Isn’t I talking now?” In particular, when Candidate Lee mentioned the real name of Candidate Park volunteers and mentioned the past criminal history, Park confronted them with “if you are a lawyer, you must respect your personality.” At the end of the debate, “You have to discuss local issues. It became a venue of attack,” he said indirectly criticizing Lee.
Reporters Joon-young Ahn and Eun-cheol Lee [email protected]