viewer
In connection with the controversy over the illegality of the former Deputy Minister of Justice Kim Hak-eui’s ban on departure from the country, he ran for the Seoul Mayor’s by-election in April after the remarks of Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae, who refuted the activities of the prosecutors’ past affairs committee and even a legitimate re-investigation. Geun-sik Kim, a professor at Kyungnam University who declared, sharply set a confrontation with him as “the master of sophistry and the king of bullshit”.
Power of the People Prof. Kim, who is in charge of the party committee chairman Song Pa-byeong in Seoul, raised his voice on the 17th, saying, “Another’discussion’ in the moon country,” and “insisting on’fluid escape’ bullshit,” in an article posted on his Facebook page.
At the same time, Professor Kim repeatedly insisted, “It is a’sophistication’ that it is possible to withdraw money under the authority of the Minister of Justice while discussing the withdrawal measure of Hwang Gyo-an.”
Prof. Kim continued, “If it is possible to prohibit Kim Hak’s withdrawal from the country ex officio,” said Professor Kim. He asked, “Why do you insist on illegality so difficult when you have the power of the minister?”
In addition, Professor Kim said, “What the people are angry with now is that the immigration office of the Ministry of Justice, the dispatched prosecutor, the chief prosecutor and the chief prosecutor of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, etc. made documents and made the withdrawal of the presidential special target illegally.” I am not asking if this is possible or not. It is just a sophistry of the same document answer.”
In addition to this, Professor Kim said, “The withdrawal of Chae Dong-wook was not actually attempted to leave the country, and thus the deportation was not actually enforced.” “Illegal withdrawal of Kim Hak-eui was actually forced to block the departure, resulting in illegal human rights violations by the public power. . He also wrote, “Withdrawal from a completely different dimension”.
viewer
Professor Kim added, “You must not commit illegality while manipulating documents because Kim Hak-ui is dislike of the people. Was it not the prosecution reform of the motherland and Chu Miae that emphasized the protection of the human rights of the suspects?”
He also raised the level of criticism, saying, “Even though it is an obvious illegal manipulation of the public power, seeing Minister Choo Mi-ae running under the authority of the Attorney General and condemning the Ministry of Justice to cover the prosecution’s family again, it shows the end of bullshit until the last day of departure.” Raised.
Earlier, on the 16th, Minister Chu posted a post on his Facebook page on the 16th, regarding the controversy over the illegality surrounding the ban on departure from Kim, “The prosecution is undermining the activities of the Prosecutor’s Office and even a legitimate re-investigation.” It cannot be done, and it cannot be said that the behavior is contrary to the reform of the prosecution that the people want.”
At the same time, Minister Chu aimed at the prosecution, saying, “I can’t erase the feeling of going through a theater-type investigation.”
Minister Chu also said, “How can the officials of the Ministry of Justice who worked during the departing of Kim, who worked at the time of departure from Korea in March 2019?” said, “I saw that I deliberately knit it as the’Chu line’. I can guess the meaning of it,” he said.
In addition, Minister Chu said, “The great prosecutor has been silent about the request for extension of the withdrawal and investigated by himself, and is taking as a problem that there is no official seal in the withdrawal request of one prosecutor. This is to postpone the responsibility of the great prosecutor and the head of the prosecutor.” Pointed out.
He also wrote, “Even though the power of the people was accused and being investigated by the competent prosecutors’ office, Anyang branch, it was transferred to the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office to form a large-scale investigation team, which was to deny the prosecution’s past activities and subsequent re-investigations.” / Reporter Kim Kyung-hoon [email protected]
< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >