 |
| Kim Doo-gwan, Democratic Party member (left) and Yoo Sang-beom, member of the People’s Power. © News1 |
In addition, Rep. Kim Doo-gwan, one of the sleeping dragons in the Democratic Party, repeatedly insisted that the impeachment of Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol is an urgent priority, rather than improving the system.
◇ Kim Doo-gwan “The impeachment of the 尹 protects the text and prerequisites for institutional reform…First, 尹”
On the afternoon of the 26th, Rep. Kim said on his Facebook page, “Are you going to impeach the president for security?” and “Because protecting the president elected by the people is because it is protecting democracy” for the safety of President Moon Jae-in. He responded to the criticism of the people’s strength for pursuing the removal of President Yoon.
Subsequently, Congressman Kim objected to the opinion that many members of the party △ fear of headwinds △ showing the opinion that it is better to remove the power of the prosecution through the reform of the prosecution system, such as complete separation of the right of investigation and prosecution rather than impeachment of Yoon Seok-yeol, because the odds are low when going to the Constitutional Court. .
Rep. Kim said, “I heard the advice of some lawmakers that institutional reform takes precedence over impeachment, but it is difficult to gain momentum for institutional reform unless the prosecutor general is impeached.” He argued that impeachment of the prosecutor general at the peak of the system is a prerequisite for institutional reform.
Therefore, Congressman Kim appealed for the participation of fellow lawmakers, saying, “We must promptly impeach Yun Suk-yeol on the basis of the violations recognized in the court’s decision to apply for provisional injunction.”
◇ Yoo Sang-beom “Ignorant, brave, president will be a big deal…
Then Rep. Yoo Sang-beom pointed out that “If I had considered and reviewed the content and meaning of the court’s decision to suspend the disciplinary effect of Yoon Seok-yeol, I wouldn’t be able to say that, but I’m ignorant and I want to be brave.”
Rep. Yoo said, “The court’s judgment is that two of the four reasons for disciplinary action have not been clarified at all, and that two of them have not been called out, so we need to examine them further. There is no basis for claiming that they are in violation of the constitution or the law. He said there was no reason for this.
“The president said that he respected the judgment of the court, but what would the president be if he disobeyed the court decision and impeached him for the reason?”
In addition to this, Rep. Yoo said, “I thought that when I was president, I was a person who would do a lot of trouble when I saw Rep. Kim insisting on limiting the inheritance and donation of parental property to a maximum of 400 million won in October.” He lamented, “The presidential self-sufficient man made a claim that went directly against the constitution that adopted capitalism.”
He did not forget to pinch painfully, saying, “Looking at recent words, Rep. Kim Doo-gwan is evaluated as Daekwon Jamyong, but I know why it is not visible.”