Ki Sung-yong’s legal representative, who was controversial over abusive and sexual harassment, made a statement.
On the 17th, attorney Seopyeong Song Sang-yeop, a law firm who is in charge of Ki Sung-yong’s legal representative, released the report on MBC’s’PD Notebook’ the previous day (16th) and his position on Mr. D, who claimed the damage.
 |
| Photo = MBC |
The legal representative pointed out that the contents of the broadcast of the’PD Handbook’ were “a tearful appearance of D, who is a victim, giving the people a biased view of what is true.” Along with this, I sent D’s upbringing file.
In the file, a man said remarks such as, “Because the lawyer became a fraudulent play, I asked him to say that it wasn’t Oboda, Ki Sung-yong”, “We didn’t even ask for (article), but we talked with each other and then flowed out.” .
Regarding this part, Ki Sung-yong said, “As for the nature of this case, D, who is a victim, expressed himself as a’public scam’. He pointed out that his attorney is saying that it will be a’public scam’ and that his position is going to be.”
In addition, he said, “Was the victim D’s uncontaminated initial statement, the other side has argued that there has been a cause and threat from Ki Sung-yong’s side,” he said. “But D, who is a victim, does not have the cause and threats of Ki Sung-yong by himself. Is testifying that it is a false claim to write a novel,” he rebutted on the contents of the upbringing file.
In response, “Did the other party’s lawyer report to the media without D’s consent and confirmation as the victim, as D’s claiming to be a victim? If the attorney on the other side distributes the press release to the media with the confirmation and consent of the person it represents (victim D), the statements of both victim D or victim D’s attorneys conflict, and one statement is not true. “The victims allegedly asked Mr. D and Mr. D’s lawyers.
 |
In addition, in the upbringing file, “We are talking to the outgoing misinformation article, and in the case of our misinformation article, please tell him to never bet because Seong-yong can bet something like defamation on your side.” “Would you like to assess like that, asking you not to bet with defamation?
The legal representative said in the’PD Handbook’ that Mr. D would present the’confirmation evidence’ that Mr. D has repeatedly mentioned in the lawsuit. “The other side is giving the reason that another person appears in the’confirmation evidence’. You can take protective measures (mosaic treatment, voice alteration, etc.) and disclose it.” He said, “We will avoid opportunities to reveal the truth for one reason or another, and if time dragging is not the purpose, the other party will immediately provide’convincing evidence’ that reveals the truth. We look forward to a responsible attitude of revealing the truth by opening it to the public.”
Lastly, he said, “A legal action to hold the other party’s legal responsibility will be raised within the 26th of this month.”
Reporter Kang Bo-ra [email protected]
<저작권자 © 싱글리스트, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지>