Maekyung.com MK Sports Reporter Park Chan-hyung
The former soccer team captain Ki Sung-yong (32, FC Seoul) refuted the opponent’s legal representative’s claim that the extortionist who had been sexually assaulted as an elementary school student had’already admitted that the initial reports of damages were not true’.
On the 18th, attorney Park Ji-hoon of the Law Firm said, “The voice file that Ki Sung-yong’s lawyer said the day before’admitted that the victim himself was false’ was nothing else but the recording of the phone call that was released to the media with the consent of the revealer on the 26th of last month. “It was edited with” he explained.
On February 24, attorney Park Ji-hoon disclosed the victim’s claim that Ki Sung-yong had similarly raped (oral sex) his juniors A and B at an elementary school soccer club camp in Jeollanam-do from January to June 2000.
View larger image
In response to the voice file that the other party’s lawyer suggested the previous day, “The victim allegedly admitted the false facts,” Ki Sung-Yong said, “It is a malicious edit of the call recording that we released last month.” I also have the original,” he refuted. Photo = MK Sports DB
Regarding the voice file presented by the lawyer Song Sang-yeop (law firm book review) on the side of Ki Sung-yong, attorney Park Ji-hoon said, “The revelator who was asked (forced) to submit a political information report saying that there was no fact of sexual violence was suffering and consulting with me will be.
We also have the original (unedited).”
Attorney Park Ji-hoon reaffirmed that “we are responding with the legal representative qualification delegated by the victims A and B,” and said, “The revelator is concerned about the punishment for spreading false information, but the lawyer has led the situation to this point.” Refuted the side’s claim.
Attorney Song Sang-yeop said on the 17th, “On behalf of Ki Sung-yong, a lawsuit will be filed within the coming 26th to hold the other party legally responsible.” Attorney Park Ji-hoon also responded, “Let’s determine whether it is defamation or dissemination of false information in the court, not in public opinion trials and media play.” [email protected]
[ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]