‘Ki Seong-yong suspicion’PD notebook’ biased broadcast’… Ki Sung-yong’s lawyer’disclosure of evidence before the public’

FC Seoul Sung-Yong Ki/Yonhap News

In the midst of the fierce court battle over the ‘suspect of sexual violence’ during FC Seoul’s elementary school days, Ki Sung-yong countered the MBC’s PD Notebook, which dealt with this controversy, as a “biased broadcast”.

Song Sang-yeop of the law firm Seopyeong, who is the legal representative of Ki Sung-yong, said in a statement released on the 17th, “The broadcast on the 16th provided a biased view of what was true to the people with the tears of the victims.”

At the same time, attorney Song said, “Yesterday, an allegation to the effect that Ki Sung-yong sexually assaulted male junior players when he was in elementary school came out on the broadcast.” Showed the situation,” he said.

Attorney Song then released D’s upbringing testimony and said, “We provided the upbringing of Mr. D, who was a victim provided in this press release for yesterday’s broadcast, but most were not broadcast.” He stressed, “I will let the public hear the testimony of Mr. D’s own upbringing and judge the truth of this situation.”

In addition, attorney Song said, “In the meantime, the other party (Mr. D) raised suspicion of sexual assault of Ki Sung-yong, and at first said,’There is very certain evidence to prove this. We will disclose it immediately.’ I can’t. If Ki Sung-yong sues or sues, I will only disclose it to the court,” he pointed out.

In addition, attorney Song said, “If a lawsuit is filed, the public does not know that the effect of prolonging the suspicion of Ki Sung-yong for many years until the trial is finalized for several years from the first, second, and third trials.” “The victim is forgotten anyway after some time, and he even says that he has nothing to damage because no one remembers it. This is the intention of the side to talk about in the lawsuit.”

In addition, attorney Song said, “If the’confirm evidence’ claimed by the other side is true, the person who will suffer the most damage is Ki Sung-yong.” He also said, “If there is another reason for obstacles, please tell us anything about the fact that the side will reveal that solid evidence to the public.”

Attorney Song continued, “I will remove all reasons that may be an obstacle to publicly showing the evidence that swears to the other side as’definite evidence’,” he said. “Since the other side will not be ignoring the people’s intellectual abilities, the other side “If it is’convincing evidence’ from the perspective of the public, it will be’convincing evidence’ even from the people’s perspective.

Attorney Song said, “I have raised a national suspicion, so everyone who wants the truth now wants to disclose the evidence.” did.

In addition, attorney Song said, “We avoid the opportunity to reveal the truth with one or another reason, and if time dragging is not the purpose, we look forward to a responsible attitude to reveal the truth by immediately revealing’definite evidence’ in front of the public.”

/Photo = MBC’PD Notebook’ broadcast screen capture

MBC’s’PD Notebook-Our Twisted Heroes’ section, which was broadcast the day before, contained controversy over school violence (academic violence) by Ki Sung-yong, baseball players Lee Young-ha and Kim Jae-hyun.

In particular, attorney Park Ji-hoon, who is in charge of the legal representatives of those who raised Ki Sung-yong’s suspicion of abuse, said in an interview, “I told me a story I could not say if they did not experience the damage.” For example, I remember the shape of my penis, and I talked with a miserable and terrible heart to the feeling when I had oral sex,” he said.

Mr. A, who claims that he was sexually assaulted by Ki Sung-yong, said, “I turned off the lights when the sports news was over. Every day, (the incident) took place at that place (campus). I was hit at the (camping house).”

Mr. B, who claims to be another victim, said, “I can’t accurately remember the number of damages, but it wasn’t called once or twice.”

Mr. A insisted, “Because I cry one day (perpetrator C, not Ki Sung-yong), he said,’Don’t do it today,’ but B was preparing next to Ki Sung-yong.” .

In addition, Mr. B said, “It was unfair for me to get out while weeping,” and “because we were together but only friends passed out, there was a feeling of resentment even at a young age.”

In addition, Mr. B said, “That’s right. I wasn’t in a situation where I could say that I was hit,” and said, “I’m afraid I might ask you to quit (soccer). I wanted to be a soccer player at that time.”

In addition, Mr. A said, “I think (Ki Seong-yong) should have apologized,” and “I tried to tell the truth, but I feel like it has become a very difficult situation.”

Attorney Park revealed on the 24th of last month that “Mr. A, who was living in a soccer club at an elementary school in Jeonnam, from January to June 2000, was raped by seniors C and D.”

At the time, A and his motive B, who were 5th graders at the time, argued that they were forced to have oral sex by their first-year seniors, Players C and D, and that if they did not respond, they were ruthlessly assaulted.

Since then, Player C was specified as Sung-Yong Ki, and Sung-Yong Ki’s management companies C2 Global and Sung-Yong Ki strongly denied the allegation and expressed a strong response.

As the controversy surrounding him spread, Ki Sung-yong told a press conference on the 7th that “I recently appointed an attorney and are preparing to hold legal responsibility.”

At the same time, Ki Sung-yong added, “I think it is correct to do my best to disclose that part.”

/ Reporter Kim Kyung-hoon [email protected]

< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >

Source