`Is the President a friend?`… Rep. Yang Hyang-ja omitted the honorific name of the tweet.

“Is the President a friend?”… Rep. Yang Hyang-ja omitted the honorific name of the tweet.

Jang Hye-jin, reporter at Busan.com [email protected]


Input: 2021-03-18 15:26:05Revision: 2021-03-18 16:17:01Published: 2021-03-18 16:01:12

Facebook
Twitter

With Yang Hyang-ja, the Democratic Party's Supreme Commissioner Twitter capture

With Yang Hyang-ja, the Democratic Party’s Supreme Commissioner Twitter capture

In addition, Rep. Yang Hyang-ja, the top member of the Democratic Party, is being criticized by netizens who tend to be close to friends who wrote on his Twitter on the 17th. The reason is that they did not use honorific titles for President Moon Jae-in and former President Roh Moo-hyun.

Rep. Yang said on Twitter that day, “Kim Young-sam selected, protected Roh Moo-hyun, and Kim Young-chun, which Moon Jae-in wrote, is the enemy of Busan.” Leave the fate of you,” he said.

Although this article was intended to support candidate Kim Young-chun, the same party that took place on the 7th of next month for the re-election of the Busan mayor, netizens who support the Democratic Party and pro-moons expressed strong dissatisfaction with the article omitting the honorific title to the president.

As of 3:30 pm on the 18th, most of the 155 comments took issue with the remarks of Congressman Yang, who omitted the title of the president. In particular, among netizens who tend to be close friends, they did not hesitate to make harsh remarks to both lawmakers.

Among these are “Is the President your friend? Look at the way you speak”, “Is Kim Young-sam, Moon Jae-in, and Roh Moo-hyun your friends? Don’t talk to me without knowing how to keep the basics,” and “I’m increasingly disappointed. If you really respect it, you shouldn’t do that. Jae-in Moon”, “Is it a big deal if I care about the title?”, “Wording is cheap”, “Is it so hard to write a letter for the President?” I poured out comments such as.

In addition, some netizens criticized the recent LH incident with articles such as “Did you sell honorifics when you were blind,” and “Apologize for speculation or speculation on the ground” by linking the suspicion of speculation by both lawmakers.

Rep. Yang Hyang-ja Twitter capture

Rep. Yang Hyang-ja Twitter capture

According to the property reports of 21st National Assembly members released by the National Assembly Public Service Ethics Committee in August last year, both lawmakers own a 3492m2 of land in Samhwa-ri, Bibong-myeon, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do. The land is jointly owned by both lawmakers and her husband, Choi Mo, half of their shares, and the value is 475.52 million won. When Congressman Yang bought this land, there were rumors that a Disneyland and Universal Studios would be established in Hwaseong City. Because of this, although it is not a new city area in the 3rd term, suspicions have arisen that both lawmakers bought the land for good development.

As the controversy grew, Congressman Yang issued a statement on the 10th and clarified, “This land is completely irrelevant to the controversial new city and that it is difficult to calculate the market price itself because there is almost no land transaction around it.” He added, “This is the land I purchased when I was promoted to a Samsung executive, and in order to prepare for the retirement after retirement, I bought the forest under the name of my spouse with the recommendation of an acquaintance.”

Jang Hye-jin, reporter at Busan.com [email protected]

.Source