In Eunjung Lim’s Facebook post… Incumbent Prosecutor “Secret Leakage Lim Eun-jung, target of airlift”

When the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office dismissed former officials with no charges in connection with the case of “Former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook, a teacher perjury,” Im Eun-jeong, a policy researcher at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, rebelled.

Researcher Lim posted the result of the great swordsman’s disposition on her Facebook this day, saying, “It’s not surprising that it was a fixed conclusion when the job was transferred,” and “I know how irrational decision-making process is.” Criticized.

The Supreme Prosecutor said on the day that “there was a judgment that there was insufficient evidence to admit the charges after making a reasonable decision on the case of perjury, teachers, and aiding civil complaints against two witnesses related to the past trial and former and incumbent public prosecutors.”

In this case, Researcher Lim had a conflict with former Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol. When Researcher Lim was recently ordered as a prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office from Insa, it was predicted that Researcher Lim would take over the case and prosecute past prosecutors and witnesses.

In 2011, the prosecution’s’Investigation Team Han Myung-sook’ testified to fellow inmates of the late Han Man-ho, former CEO Han Shin Gun-young, and Kim Mo, “the former representative of Han said, “He gave money to the former Prime Minister.” There was an allegation that he had pressed him to do it. Choi came out as a prosecutor’s witness in the 2011 investigation of Han former Prime Minister Han’s illegal political fund of 900 million won, and testified that “I heard a word that Han gave money to former Prime Minister Han.” However, in April of last year, the case came to the surface when a petition was filed with the Ministry of Justice stating that it was a false coercion.

Researcher Lim said that he had been in the position that Choi had to be prosecuted by criminal charges. It is from the view that the prosecution, who prosecuted Choi for perjury and investigated the former prime minister at the time, pressured Choi for perjury (a perjury teacher).

This is well reflected in the position that Researcher Lim made on his Facebook page on the afternoon of the 4th. He said, “It was a different opinion that it would be right for me to file a criminal prosecution against the prosecution’s witnesses to file a criminal prosecution and file a criminal prosecution. It was a different opinion.” I was appointed as the chief prosecutor (of this case).”

There is a view from inside the prosecution that it is illegal for Researcher Lim to make such a claim on his Facebook, etc., and to disclose the process of internal prosecution discussions to the outside.

In the afternoon of this afternoon, Andong-ji Commissioner Park Chul-wan insisted on the prosecution’s internal online network, Eprus, that “as a prosecutor, condoning this behavior is another meaning of wrapping my family.”

Introducing the Supreme Court case in 2007, Director Park Ji-cheong claimed that Researcher Lim was the subject of investigation by the High-ranking Public Officials Criminal Investigation Office (Airborne Division). According to the Supreme Court precedent introduced by Director Park, the Supreme Court said,’In the state that an investigative agency such as the prosecution is conducting an investigation on a specific case, the investigation agency has secured certain data and investigates the current case, the guilt of the suspect, and the handling of recruits. It was judged that the information such as the person in charge has some opinions (omitted) is considered to be a secret inside the investigative agency.’

Then, Chief Park said, “(Researcher Lim) the head of the 3rd inspector had an opinion that it would be appropriate to file a criminal filing, and the fact that he had an opinion that he would file a criminal prosecution and file a prosecution corresponds to a confidential leak on the job.” did.

He also said, “Researcher Im’s posting on Facebook is a serious crime, and he should be responsible for criminal and disciplinary law corresponding to the act.” We look forward to taking the necessary measures in this act.”

Reporter Oh Won-seok [email protected]