“I’m sorry Jung In-ah” commemoration wave, police accusations poured over 16-month adoption child abuse death case: The Korean Human Rights News

▲ I want to know what was aired on the 2nd,’Why did Jung In die?-271 days of perpetrator and bystander’ broadcast capture provided = SBS

[한국인권신문=백종관 기자]

The death of Jung In-yang, a 16-month-old adopted child, was reported, and on the second day,’I’m sorry Jung In-ah’ was on the real-time search word, and a wave of commemoration from entertainers and citizens continued.

On the 2nd, SBS’I want to know that’ aired’Why did Jung In die?-271 days of perpetrators and bystanders’, dealing with the abuse of Jung In-yang, who died after 16 months of life, which gave a big shock to viewers.

On this day’s broadcast, the late Jeong-in, adopted by her adoptive parents at the age of 7 months, died of bruises in her whole body 271 days after adoption.

After adopting Jung In-yang in February of last year, the adoptive mother was found to have committed abuse since about a month, and was convicted of child abuse and fatality, and her step-father was also sent to the prosecution on charges of neglect and aid.

However, her adoptive parents claimed that Jung In Yang’s death was “played with the first on the sofa, and the second fell,” and insisted that he cried out loud crying, “What if my child dies?”

However, the crew of’I want to know that’ revealed the situation that Jung In-yang was abused by her adoptive parents. Experts who analyzed CCTV images, autopsy reports and medical records on the day of death said, “The stomach was full of blood, and the pancreas was completely amputated.”

want to know that ‘Why did Jung In die?-271 days of perpetrator and bystander’ broadcast capture provided = SBS

In addition, as it was found that Jeong In-yang had fractures in both arms, collarbones, and ribs of the legs, an expert said, “16 months will break the ribs? This is unconditional abuse.” At the time, an emergency medicine specialist who examined Jung In-yang in the emergency room explained, “If this is a picture, child abuse is right enough to appear in textbooks.”

Meanwhile, criticism was poured out by the local police station, which closed the internal affairs of Eo Young Boo-young, believing only in the words of Jeong In-i’s adoptive parents, by citizens, nursery teachers and pediatricians who reported that there was only a child in the car.

On the bulletin board of the police station’s website, criticisms such as “Is child abuse only when the trauma is visible”, “You helped Jung-in die”, “Take the responsibility of the police in charge of the case”, and “Punish the person in charge of the case” were posted. Is coming.

However, the police only gave warnings and cautions to the officers who handled the second and third reports, respectively. In addition, a warning was given to the head of the female and juvenile manager, and the former head of the female juvenile manager was given a cautionary disposition.

Reporter Baek Jong-gwan [email protected]

Source