Im Eun-jeong, inspector of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, Prosecutors’ Office. yunhap news
Regarding the suspicion of perjury in the trial of former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook, which was concluded without charges, the prosecution policy researcher Lim Eun-jeong (deputy prosecutor) at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office said on the 23rd, “Unfair controversy and responsibility are the case of receiving arrows as if it belonged to Deputy General Manager Nam-gwan Cho (representing the prosecutor’s office) and the prosecution. Because of my personality, I have to bear it,” he said.
On the same day, Prosecutor Lim said on his Facebook page, “At a meeting to discuss whether or not the inmate’s witnesses are prosecuted, it was a very blatant process when the Minister of Justice ordered a joint inspection.” It was absurd to think that we should pretend to be fair,” he argued.
He said, “I was not able to ask questions that should be checked with the prosecutors on the investigation team at the joint prosecutors’ office, so I couldn’t ask the inmate’s witnesses to be prosecuted, so I was spared,” he said. “It is difficult to expect fairness after being notified of the attendance of the meeting of the chief prosecutors with the high prosecutors, but the Minister of Justice He added that there was no way not to attend in the yard where there was the command of the man.
He said, “As long as I attended the meeting, there is no way not to comply with the results of the meeting, so I will meet the first morning after passing the statute of limitations with a terrible heart.” It will be.
“I am so sorry for the inmates who gave me the courage and it is painful,” he said, and “I will try harder to become a less embarrassing prosecution tomorrow.”
Meanwhile, the suspicion of a former prime minister’s investigation team’s suspicion of a perjury teacher was raised in an inmate’s disclosure in April of last year. Inmate A filed a complaint with the Ministry of Justice and insisted that in 2011 the investigative team was pressured to testify against the former Prime Minister Han Man-ho, a former donor of money, by capturing fellow inmates in the detention center of the late Han Man-ho.
On the 17th, Minister of Justice Park Beom-gye invoked the authority to conduct investigations related to the’Suspicion of a Perjury Teacher’. On the 19th, the heads of high swordsmen nationwide and the heads of the great swordsman decided to non-prodict the inmate Kim Mo, according to the judgment of the existing great swordsman, after a marathon meeting that lasted 11 hours and 30 minutes.
At this meeting, Acting Cho gave an opportunity to question the prosecution policy researcher Lim Eun-jeong, but he declined, saying, “There is no, it doesn’t seem like a place to ask questions.” He gave himself up the opportunity to express his’need to prosecute’ in front of those who would participate in the vote. Researcher Lim gave an opportunity to express his opinions at the Great Sword Researcher’s Meeting on the 5th, but he refused to attend.
On the 22nd, Minister Park expressed his intention to accept the decision, saying, “I will not re-command,” regarding the decision of the Great Sword Expansion Council, which dealt with the suspicion of’absolute harm’.
Reporter Go Seok-hyun [email protected]
