If the’Anti Discrimination Act, which is still sluggish,’ had already been made, there was no tragic choice of Sergeant Byun Hee-soo.

If the anti-discrimination law had been made early, could former Sergeant Byun Hee-soo (23) remain in the military and control the tank after sex change surgery? It is very likely.

Because the Anti-Discrimination Act is a law that prevents and corrects’discrimination’ that treats someone unfavorably in employment or the use of education and administrative services, using gender, disability, race, religion, sexual orientation, and gender identity as excuses’without reasonable reason’. to be.

As the news that a former sergeant Byeon, who was forced to be discharged from the army for having undergone sex change surgery, has recently taken his own life, calls for the enactment of an anti-discrimination law are growing.

On the 4th, the Justice Party prepared a space for mourning in commemoration of Sergeant Byun in front of the office of Rep. Jang Hye-young of the National Assembly, saying, “I hope all 300 members of the National Assembly will take full responsibility for the death of Sergeant Byeon. In addition, Democratic Party Rep Kwon In-sook said on Facebook on the same day, “I’m so sorry and sorry. It is also a sinful equality law and anti-discrimination law,” he wrote.

Discussions in the National Assembly on the anti-discrimination law have been at a standstill for decades. Even the’Anti-Discrimination Bill’ initiated by the Justice Party in June last year has not been reviewed once and is tied to the National Assembly’s Legislative Judicial Committee. The bill on equality and anti-discrimination legislation, which is being prepared by Democratic Party lawmaker Lee Sang-min, is not receiving momentum. Congressman Lee on this day <한겨레>In a talk with the talks, “There are many people in the party trying to avoid LGBT issues, and the enactment of the anti-discrimination law is not a welcome agenda, so we need to gather our strength as much as we can.”

In the meantime, Congressman Lee has delayed the initiative several times, saying that he will persuade the Christian world as much as possible and come up with a bill. The intention was to go through a process of persuasion even if it was slow, taking lessons from the experience that the anti-discrimination bill was stranded against the Protestant world. Congressman Lee also proposed a compromise plan containing an exception to the effect that “religious acts according to the essential doctrine of a specific religion are not regarded as discrimination”, but there was no change in the attitudes of the Protestant world. Rather, the Buddhist world, which had suffered from the corruption of the Protestant world, called for a “protestant observing bill” and urged the enactment of the “original draft of the National Human Rights Commission”.

In the political world, voices say that the strategy should be revised to’break through the front’ with the tragedy of Sergeant Byeon. Rep. Lee said, “The attitude of the Christian community has not changed, and the Buddhist community, which initially supported the anti-discrimination law, is rebelling against the exception clause.” “Excluding the exception clause and further refined the provisions of the law, it will be initiated after the by-election in April. ”

Lee’s bill has been co-sponsored by more than 20 people, including the Democratic Party and the Open Democratic Party. In the beginning, Congressman Lee tried to’break through’ the protests of the Protestant world by gathering about 100 co-sponsors, but it has been a long time since the lawmakers watched the attention of large churches in the district. Rep. Lee is not even revealing the list of proposers, fearing that members of the lawmakers who participated in the joint initiative will be targets of attack by the Protestant community.

[email protected]

Source