![[사진 온라인 커뮤니티 캡처]](https://i0.wp.com/pds.joins.com/news/component/htmlphoto_mmdata/202101/18/09c1c94c-d307-4406-a4b8-813a895b7087.jpg?w=560&ssl=1)
[사진 온라인 커뮤니티 캡처]
When purchasing alcoholic beverages through a delivery application, controversy has arisen in the online community that he virtually refused to authenticate, saying, “It’s okay because it’s a lawyer’s house,” and’cheopardy’ such as a full refund in a situation where adult authentication such as ID is required.
On the 17th, an online community posted an article titled’Gap-Jil a lawyer who made delivery’. The title of this article was later changed to'(Supreme) husband only lawyer’.
This post contained the process of delivering food with alcohol to a home from a restaurant in Suji, Yongin, Gyeonggi Province. The speaker A of the post explained the process after saying, “I ordered two soups and two soju bottles in the morning, and I delivered them myself.”
According to the post, Mr. A dialed the doorbell at the house he had delivered, but heard the voice of a girl saying, “Please leave it at the door.” When Mr. A said, “It is not possible to have alcohol,” Mr. B, who is believed to be the mother of a girl, said, “Just leave it,” and replied, “It’s a regular and it’s a lawyer’s house, but it’s okay.”
![[사진 온라인 커뮤니티 캡처]](https://i0.wp.com/pds.joins.com/news/component/htmlphoto_mmdata/202101/18/7825b725-8e28-4902-8f07-77e24f23f7d6.jpg?w=560&ssl=1)
[사진 온라인 커뮤니티 캡처]
Mr. A said, “We should not be punished for paying fines.” However, Mr. B said, “I will do that next time, so just leave it.” Mr. A left with only food. Then, Mr. B’s explanation was that Mr. B called and screamed, “I came out, why did he go?”
In the post, Mr. A claimed that Mr. B’s husband had also been abused through text messages. Mr. A said, “Is it okay for a lawyer to violate the law?” and asked, “If you have flexibility and stop doing business for a month or two, will it be held by the state or is the lawyer responsible?”
The post has spread to several online communities, causing controversy. One netizen pointed out that “I am suspicious that the lawyer is correct,” and “If you are a real lawyer, you will not have a disadvantageous conversation in that way when using a text message with the contents of your conversation.”
Reporter Na Unchae [email protected]