Rep. Nam-guk Kim inquiring at the National Assembly Legislative Judicial Committee. yunhap news
In connection with the controversy on the 22nd of the 22nd, the Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Nam-guk said, “It would be good to inform North Korea of our various situations by introducing a really well-made drama like’Crash Landing on Love’ or K-pop. I need to worry.” However, it is pointed out that the reality is poor in a situation where North Korea strongly blocks the viewing of Korean dramas through the recent adoption of the’Reaction Ideology and Culture Exclusion Act’.
Rep. Kim said in an interview with YTN radio’Hwang Bo-seon’s Departure New Morning’ and said, “It is called the North Korean Human Rights Improvement Movement. Is it?” he said.
Regarding the concerns of the US politicians, he said, “Our government should respond more actively toward the international”. “The anti-North Korea warfare law is not a law restricting the freedom of expression, but it is for the life and safety of our people on the border. It is necessary to explain well that it is a law with minimum measures.”
He said, “Because I am abroad, it seems that the United States and other countries do not know exactly how much the safety and lives of the people on the border of our country are being threatened.”
“Even civic groups that distribute warfare to North Korea are not simply a human rights movement, but rather, warfare to North Korea is often a means of making money.” It is necessary to actively inform this part.”
Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol Suspended Discipline for Two Months Suspension of Suspension Regarding the court hearing, “I don’t think it will be a big problem when we evaluate both the term of office remaining for President Yoon and two months of suspension.” I expect that the court will make a decision that respects it.”
Regarding the complaint call to a Justice Party spokesman who criticized his remarks at the abortion abolition public hearing, he said, “I called to resolve the misunderstanding, and I was of course responsible and called the person who made a problematic remark. I came out with a feminine frame in the way that I gave it to a woman.”
Rep. Kim said, “Because the Justice Party made a remark that the Justice Party could not do, we raised a question about it, and we should discuss this with an issue. I can’t understand why I was talking wrong with it.”
Reporter Bae Jae-seong [email protected]