The revealer who suddenly disappeared from Hyuna’s refutation
On the 23rd, an internet community posted an article claiming the title of’Hyun-ah, I thought I would contact you first. Are you the first perpetrator of school violence?’ The author stated that she was an elementary school classmate with Hyuna and claimed that she was violated by Hyuna in the fifth grade.
He wrote, “I called it a place called’backside of school’ and said,’When have you been friends since?’ and said,’I have never had a friend like you’, and I remember slapping it around the cheek. I was uncomfortable with glasses, so I took it off and thrown it myself.” .
In response, Hyuna wrote, “Sometimes I get angry when I get too disparate and misrepresented interest, but I just have to laugh it off because it’s the work I chose for my dream.
On the 23rd, Hyuna directly denied the allegations of school violence through her Instagram. /Photo = Reporter Lim Hanbyul
He wrote, “From the fifth grade of elementary school when I was 12 years old, starting with an assistant role as a child when I was 8 years old, I went to my agency as a trainee and lived with my dream of becoming a singer, so my school days came and said, but it was very regretful for me.” He dismissed the suspicion, saying, “The story I want to tell you is that I haven’t hit the cheek or anyone. I hope the person who wrote it will have many happy things in his heart.”
In response to Hyuna’s refutation and a notice of the agency’s tough response, the post was suddenly deleted and disappeared.
‘Girl of the Month’ Chu revealer “It seems like my memory has been adapted and changed”
The author, who revealed that she had been subjected to school violence by girl group Girl of the Month, Chu, made a public apology, saying that it was a false fact in the notice of the agency’s hard-line response. Chu recently appeared on MBC’s’What do you do when you play?’ However, the damage article was published on the 22nd, stating that he suffered mental violence due to Chu’s constant seizure while in school.
Accordingly, the agency Blockberry Creative repeatedly emphasized Chu’s innocence through two statements on the 23rd and 24th. The agency suggested a strong response, saying, “The online contents related to the girl of the month, Chu, are malicious and obvious false facts,” and “We are preparing to sue for defamation by spreading false information through the law firm Square.”
All the authors who revealed that they had been subjected to school violence by girl group Girl of the Month, Chu, apologized for being exaggerated. /Photo = Reporter Jang Dong-gyu
In the end, the author, who claimed to have been harmed by Chu, told the online community on the 23rd that the agency’s first official position appeared, “All the contents I wrote were exaggerated. I didn’t get along with Kim Ji-woo (Chu) in school, and the time after that As it flows, the memory seems to have been adapted and changed. When I first wrote and felt something was wrong, I should have written it, but my wrong judgment made it so far.”
It doesn’t end just because you delete an article or apologize. Even if it turns out that it is unfounded false facts, celebrities who are once caught up in the ‘abusive suspicion’ suffer a big blow to the image. If’Me Too’ (Me Too: I was also) is continuing, and the disclosure of the exposers is revealed to be false, the victims who were actually victims will inevitably shrink. Unfounded revelation only blurs the essence. Therefore, the revelation toward someone is bound to be more cautious.