Jong-in Kim, Chairman of the National Power Emergency Response Committee. Reporter Oh Jong-taek
On the 2nd, Ik-pyo Hong, chairman of the Democratic Party’s Policy Committee, argued that “this is closer to the transfer action that Chairman Kim said,” and “policy for Japan rather than Korea” regarding the’Korea-Japan submarine tunnel promotion’ mentioned by Kim Jong-in of the People’s Power Emergency Response Committee. did.
On the morning of the morning of the KBS radio’Kim Kyung-rae’s Strongest Preview’, Hong said, “The only profit we get through an undersea tunnel with Japan is that it goes to Japan, but Japan will go to China, Russia and Europe through Korea and North Korea. It is the way that can be opened,” he said.
He added, “I don’t know why you are saying this policy suddenly and suddenly. Most of the logistics experts on the Korean Peninsula will be negative, except for those who have a stake in Japan among those who log in to the Busan area.” .
Chairman Kim announced on the 1st that he would visit Busan, one of the by-election battlefields, to support the construction of a new airport on Gadeokdo Island and review the undersea tunnel between Busan and Kyushu, Japan. He explained, “It is a project that is expected to have a tremendous economic effect with a production added effect of 54.5 trillion won and an employment induction effect of 450,000 people with a much smaller fiscal burden compared to Japan.”
After that, the’pro-Japanese’ offensive continued in the passport. Democratic Party chief spokesman Choi In-ho said at the party’s senior strategy meeting that “it is necessary to pay attention to the public concern that it can be used for Japan’s ambitions to advance into the continent,” and “the pro-Japanese DNA was initiated.”
“It has been a long time since discussions against the public opinion that the Korea-Japan submarine tunnel only allows Japan to enter the continent have been stopped” (Rep. Woo Won-sik) and “Japan’s disclaimer” (Rep. Yang Ki University), and other Democratic Party lawmakers continue to criticize it. Former Presidents Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun also protested, saying that they had positively mentioned the construction of an undersea tunnel between Korea and Japan.
Reporter Eunbin Kim [email protected]