Mayor Oh Se-hoon and Park Won-soon are unable to supply 30,000 public housing units during term
Can Seoul Mayor Candidates Realize’Supply of 300,000 and 700,000 Houses’?
SH positively refuted “Fake’is not appropriate” even for residents such as happy houses.”
[우먼컨슈머= 김아름내 기자] It is argued that there are only 4 out of 10’real public housings’ where homeless people can live for a long period of time, such as 20 or 50 years, as of 2020.
In a press conference on the 10th, the Federation for Economic Justice and Practice criticized 132,000 of the 233,000 public housing units SH (Seoul Housing and Urban Corporation) owned as of the end of last year as’fake’. Public housing where homeless people can live with low rent for more than 10 years is’real’, and lease-type jeonse leases and long-term safe housing provided by a system that supports cheonsei deposit are’fake, fake’.
Gyeongsilryeon viewed real public housing as 230,000 permanent units, 170,000 dwellings for 50 years, 288,000 nationals, and 330,000 long-term jeonse. Purchased leases of 95,000, happy houses of 66,000, and fake rentals of 310,000 were classified as fake public housing.
According to Gyeongsilryeon, in the case of long-term public housing, Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon provided 230,000 units from 2006 to 2010, and between Mayor Park Won-soon from 2011 to 2020, respectively, 270,000 units. It is the position of Kyeongsilyeon that 81% of the 230,000 houses during Mayor Oh and 27% of the 27,000 houses during Mayor Park are real public housing.
Yun Eun-ju, the secretary of the Gyeongsilryeon Urban Reform Center, mentioned the actual supply of public housing from past mayors and stressed that “the Seoul mayoral candidate should make a feasible pledge to release 300,000 and 700,000 public housing.”
Gyeongsilryeon also raised suspicion that Seoul’s public housing performance was inflated.
Seoul’s official data stated that 84,000 units were actually supplied with the goal of a performance plan of 60,000 public housing units for 4 years for the 6th civil election (from the second half of 2014 to the second half of 2018), but looking at the SH inventory during this period, only 9,000 units increased. will be. This is the period when the current Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Byun Chang-heum was the president of SH Corporation.
In addition, 70,000 units, or 71% of the 95,000 purchased leases in Seoul, were redevelopment leases. “The redevelopment method has a problem in which the indigenous people are expelled and the private sector takes profits,” said Yun Eun-ju, and pointed out that “constructors, unions, and speculators take huge unearned income.”
According to the Gyeongsil Ryeon survey, the average percentage of rental housing after redevelopment is 18%, and only 14% of tenants before redevelopment move into apartments after development. Of the 4,561 households with existing tenants, 655 households are.
Secretary Yun Eun-joo said, “It shows that the public housing needed by the common people cannot be increased by relying on public housing that is partially returned in the redevelopment and reconstruction stage.” I will do it.”
“Citizens can’t feel that SH and LH promote housing stability and provide benefits,” said An Jin-i, CEO of Together Life. “The existing market price of 80% and 90% of rent is not cheap. It is not cheaper than the abnormally skyrocketing price for 4 years. “It’s 10% cheaper, so it’s a benefit,” he said.
Representative Ahn criticized, “Even if a worker works for 10 to 15 years, it is almost impossible to arrange my own home,” he said. “The 25 real estate measures did not stabilize the actual house price.” He also criticized the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Byun Chang-heum, saying, “I haven’t lost my ability to work.”
On the other hand, SH Corporation said, “Of the 230,000 units supplied by the Corporation, 50,000 were customized for consumers such as happy housing, purchased lease, and private lease.” “Real” and classifying happiness houses that act as residential ladders by income and class as “fake rental housing” is an inappropriate classification even for the 50,000 households currently living,” he refuted.
Regarding’Happy Housing’, which is pointed out that the residence period is less than 10 years and the rent is expensive, SH Corporation said, “It is a rental housing built in a place where work and school are close, and public transportation is convenient. He said, “We set the residence period for 6 to 10 years.”
In addition, in the claim that jeonse lease is a’deposit only’ housing, he emphasized that “SH Corporation is a public rental housing that provides administrative and financial support as a housing that contracts with the landlord as a contract party and re-leases to the tenant.”
Copyright © Women Consumer Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited