“Even if it gives you benefits, it’s not attractive”
Gangnam mega complexes negative
Union that goes up to the threshold of project implementation
There are already signs of division of residents
viewer
There are 222 places selected by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport as candidates for Seoul’s’Public Development (Public Direct Implementation and Maintenance Project, Urban Public Housing Complex Project)’ under the ‘2/4 Supply Measures’. Among them, 67 candidate sites for’public direct implementation and maintenance projects (redevelopment and reconstruction)’. It is known that it includes a small reconstruction complex in Gangnam, as well as the New Town release area in Gangbuk. As a result of the Seoul Economy’s survey of major redevelopment and reconstruction associations, the public implementation and maintenance projects, although the benefits were greater, were reluctant to hand over the right to implement the projects to the public. Among these, in some sites, there is also a sense of conflict, such as pressing the existing union executives saying that some members should go to public development.
First of all, unions that have already been selected as pilot projects for public redevelopment are negative for newly introduced public implementation and maintenance projects. An official in Seongbuk District 1 said, “The public implementation and maintenance project announced by the government has no more specific details than public redevelopment. Participating in such a project only increases confusion among residents, and then the project is only delayed.” An official from Heukseok District 2 said, “I am concerned that the public implementation and maintenance project transfers land ownership and business rights to the public.” I think there is.” “The redevelopment cooperatives want to benefit from building my house quickly, but they also have a great desire to build a good house well,” said the official. said.
Some are also predicted that the government’s successive announcements of countermeasures could increase the number of options for maintenance projects, which could act as a conflict factor for residents. This phenomenon is already appearing in the actual field. Resident divisions are also occurring in the cooperatives between the project implementation or the threshold, while allowing the private maintenance project that is currently in progress to be converted to a public method.
In fact, an official from a maintenance industry in Yongsan, Seoul, who had received the project implementation approval, said, “Some members even asked if it is possible to convert to a public-led maintenance project even if they obtained the project implementation approval from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. He said, “We are tense because we can abuse public-led maintenance projects for the purpose of delaying the project or catching a house.”
In the case of mega-reconstruction complexes in the Gangnam area, such as Daechi Eunma and Songpa Jamsil Jugong 5, this is a negative position. An official of the A large-scale reconstruction complex in Gangnam said, “What needs the public is a low-profitable area, not a complex in the Gangnam area.” No,” he drew. Meanwhile, the government is planning to select 222 places to carry out a public direct implementation maintenance project or an urban public housing complex project in Seoul and hold a briefing session for residents after the Lunar New Year holidays.
/ Reporter Park Yoon-seon [email protected], Reporter Dong Ji-young [email protected]
< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >