Hearing the appropriateness of disciplinary procedures and reasons… A de facto lawsuit
Next week’s trial results inevitably hitting President Yoon and the Blue House
On the morning of the morning of the 23rd, one day before the second interrogation date, a banner to support President Yoon was installed in front of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul. yunhap news
The second interrogation of the application for suspension of execution filed by Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol in objection to the disposition of’two months of honesty’ will be held at the Seoul Administrative Court on the 24th at 3pm. As the court examines the requirements for suspension of execution such as’irreversible damages’, as well as the grounds for disciplinary action and the procedure for the formation of a disciplinary committee, it seems to be an important decision to determine the justification of the punishment of President Yun. On the 23rd, attorney Wan-gyu Lee, the legal representative at Yoon’s side, said on the 23rd, “We plan to submit a written document on several questions to be prepared by the court.” In the questionnaire that the 12th Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Presiding Officer Hong Soon-wook) delivered to President Yoon and the Ministry of Justice, “Is the rule of law or the general interests of society included in the’hard to recover damages’?”, “The specifics of public welfare violated by the decision to suspend execution. In addition to questions related to general requirements for suspension of execution, such as “what is the content”, it also includes content that addresses the legitimacy of the disciplinary procedures and reasons, such as the legitimacy of the formation of the disciplinary committee, individual reasons for disciplinary action, and the purpose of the document’Analysis of the propensity of the court. It is interpreted to mean that the judgment on the final lawsuit to cancel the two-month disciplinary suspension from suspension is difficult to come out of during the remaining term of President Yoon’s term. As the weight of the court decision has increased, the person who cannot persuade the court is inevitable. If the suspension of execution is cited, President Yoon can immediately return to his duties and empower him in so-called’living power investigations’ such as the investigation of the Wolseong nuclear power plant. President Moon Jae-in, who reapproved the disciplinary proposal, is also inevitable due to criticism that “the prosecution has undermined the political neutrality and independence of the prosecution through unreasonable discipline.” On the other hand, if it is dismissed, Yun’s position is expected to be even narrower. The passport’s resignation pressure, which attacks the lawsuit against disciplinary action as a “rebellion against the president,” will intensify. President Moon, who decides to change ministers as an exit strategy for the’Chumi-ae-Yun Seok-yeol conflict’, will have time to settle the confusion of the legal affairs and prosecution organizations. It is expected that Yoon will be inaugurated in February of next year when he returns to the prosecutor’s office. By Ok Ki-won, staff reporter [email protected]