Kim Hak’s Illegal Withdrawal’Transfer Conflict’
Intensified by prosecution of persons involved in Suwon District Prosecution
Material photo” alt=”High-level officials criminal investigation office and the prosecution. <한겨레> Material photo” />
High-ranking officials criminal investigation office and the prosecution. Material photo
Regarding whether the high-ranking public officials criminal investigation office (Airborne Office) has the right to investigate and prosecute over the prosecution in a case involving prosecutors, the court replied, “A matter to be judged by the court in charge of specific cases.” It is noteworthy because it is the opinion of the Supreme Court arising out of a growing conflict between the airlift and the prosecution over the right to file a prosecution in the case of illegal withdrawal of Kim Hak-ei, former Vice Minister of Justice. Summarizing the coverage on the 4th, the Supreme Court Office of the Supreme Court responded to the question of the power of the people, Assemblyman Han-Hong Yoon’s office, asking,’Can the public prosecutor have the right to investigate and file prosecution in the criminal case of the prosecutor in preference to the prosecution? It is related to, and if a specific case continues to the court and it is necessary to make a judgment, the judge in charge will interpret and apply the law to make a judgment,” he replied. Previously, Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office of Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office Lee Seong-yoon and former Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Lee Gyu-won, who were involved in the suspected illegal departure from the former Deputy Minister of Justice Kim in accordance with the Air Defense Act stipulated last month, “If the prosecutor detects the charges of a high-ranking public official, the case must be transferred to the airlift”. The investigation team’s prosecutor’s case was transferred to the airlift. The Ministry of Airborne repatriation to the prosecution for reasons such as’the investigation is not available’ and sent an official letter stating that’after the investigation is complete, send the case so that the airlift can determine whether or not to be prosecuted’. Previously, Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office of Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office Lee Seong-yoon and former Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Lee Gyu-won, who were involved in the suspected illegal departure from the former Deputy Minister of Justice Kim in accordance with the Air Defense Act stipulated last month, “If the prosecutor detects the charges of a high-ranking public official, the case must be transferred to the airlift”. The investigation team’s prosecutor’s case was transferred to the airlift. The Ministry of Airborne repatriation to the prosecution for reasons such as’the investigation is not available’ and sent an official letter stating,’After the investigation is complete, send the case so that the airlift can determine whether or not to be prosecuted.’ In response, the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office immediately refuted, saying, “If the airborne agency transfers the case to another investigative agency, it no longer has the authority to engage in the case.” Suwon District Prosecutor’s Office subsequently rejected the request for the airlift and prosecuted the prosecutor Cha Gyu-geun, head of the Immigration and Foreigner Policy Division of the Ministry of Justice, on the 1st of the last day for obstructing the exercise of the right to abuse of authority and writing false official documents. It is said that the prosecution has not yet been decided on whether to prosecute Lee, who refused to attend the prosecution four times. With the Suwon District Prosecutor’s’bullet prosecution’ who rejected the request for the airlift, the conflict between the airlift and the prosecution is expected to be decided according to the judgment of the judge in charge. Prosecutor Lee and others are expected to argue that the prosecution’s filing of prosecution is illegal or unfair based on the Airlift Act in a future trial. By Jo Yoon-young, staff reporter