Collecting opinions of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office on the ruling party’s legislative policy
“Nationwide
Opening of the Prosecutors’ Meeting”
“Organizational Egoism Vichila” Prudence also
material photo” alt=”The prosecution flag in front of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office in Seocho-dong, Seoul. The prosecution flag in front of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office in Seocho-dong, Seoul. <한겨레> Material photo
The backlash inside the prosecution is increasing over the ruling party’s promotion of the serious crime investigation office (investigation office). As the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office is scheduled to gather opinions from front-line prosecutors by the 3rd, it is expected that this week will be a watershed whether the prosecution’s systematic backlash will become visible. The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office recently sent an official letter to the front-line prosecutors’ office requesting a collection of opinions on the establishment of the investigation office, the abolition of the prosecutor’s office law, and the establishment of public prosecution offices. This is because the National Assembly Legislative Judicial Committee, which is pursuing legislation, requested the Ministry of Justice to collect opinions. After gathering the opinions of the front-line prosecutors by the 3rd, it seems that there will be a position announcement at the level of the great swordsman. At present, the prosecution’s internal bulletin board has even posted a real-name protest that’the national prosecutor’s meeting should be held’, so it was a concern that Prosecutor General Yoon Seok-yeol might come to the front directly. There is an opinion that it may be a burden to the prosecution’s organization to come to the front, so there is a prospect that he can remain in the position of the prosecutor’s office. There is also a possibility that Yoon, who ends up in the game, will appear in person. Inside the prosecution, it is predicted that collective actions such as a review meeting or statement may continue, as in the case of Yoon’s discipline at the end of last year. From the end of last week, “the national prosecutor’s meeting should be held, not the review prosecutor’s meeting,” in the prosecution’s internal network. The real name opinions of cooperation officer) are coming up. Cha Ho-dong, the prosecutor of the Women and Children’s Crime Investigation Department, Daegu District Prosecutors’ Office, argued, “The degree of involvement and cooperation of the prosecution in police investigations is increasing even in countries where cooperation between prosecutors did not exist due to the emergence of sophisticated and complex crimes. However, there are also concerns that if the prosecution’s collective action becomes a reality, it may face opposing public opinion such as reform resistance or organizational egoism. One of the chief prosecutors at the front-line district prosecutor said, “There was a clear problem of’proceeding violations’ during the discipline of General Yoon, so public opinion was not bad about the organizational backlash, but this time it is a matter of the system, so it seems necessary to look into the public’s eyes. ”Showed a cautious position. An attorney from the prosecutor’s office said, “It is a situation in which front-line prosecutors can speak out about the bill.” Rather, the ruling party, which hastily pushed forward with the bill, may face headwinds.” By Ok Ki-won, staff reporter [email protected]