Former manager Shin Hyun-joon,’Gap-Jil and Propofol controversy not alleged? It’s not false disclosure’ [전문]

Former manager Kim Mo, who raised the suspicion of taking propofol and controversy with actor Shin Hyun-jun, rerefuted Shin Hyun-jun’s allegations of innocence.

Kim said through a legal representative on the 22nd, “Shin Hyun-jun said that the prosecution had concluded the case without charge in relation to the controversy over the Gap-jil and the drug medication that he (former manager Kim) raised. It is asserted as if it were, but this is not true.”

Mr. Kim explained, “I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy against Shin Hyun-jun,” he explained. did.

“However, I have raised the issue because there are many false facts that could damage my honor among the clarifications released by Mr. Hyun-jun Shin regarding the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy.” “This is the content of the interview, or it was announced in the process of refuting the content of my interview, and I have only made a decision without charge because it is difficult to see that there is intention to defame me or defamation.”

Regarding the suspicion of Shin Hyun-jun’s administration of propofol, he said, “I have raised a problem, but the complaint was rejected because the statute of limitations was already exceeded.” Separately, Mr. Kim said that he had requested an investigation into whether or not the clarification of’Mr. Kim introduced the hospital’ even though he had not introduced the hospital that received the Propopul medication to Shin Hyun-jun. At the same time, he said that the expression’introduced’ was difficult to see as defamation, and that Shin Hyun-jun was found not accused.

After revealing Shin Hyun-jun’s gap, Mr. Shin’s acquaintances interviewed him and said, “After receiving the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-joon, he did not pay it.” He said that he filed a lawsuit for defamation.

He added, “Currently, Shin Hyun-joon has sued the prosecution for defamation on the grounds that the contents of his disclosure are false,” he added. “After the prosecution’s investigation results come out, he will restate his position.”

In July of last year, Mr. Kim claimed that he had been unfairly treated by Shin Hyun-jun for 13 years. It also raised suspicion of Shin Hyun-jun’s administration of propofol. In this regard, Shin Hyun-jun refuted that it was unfounded and sued Kim for defamation, and both sides continued to fight legally. Due to the incident, Shin Hyun-jun stopped broadcasting activities, such as getting off the show. Recently, Shin Hyun-jun published an essay’Woollim’ containing an autobiographical story.

▲ Below is the full text of the statement from former manager Hyun-jun Shin

1. I am Kim Kwang-seop (tel: 010-2123-0757), who previously worked as a manager for actor Shin Hyun-jun. Recently, Shin Hyun-joon claimed that the prosecution had closed the case without charge in relation to the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy and the drug administration controversy raised by him, and he argues that the contents of the disclosure he filed are false, but this is not true. .

-Relating to the controversy

I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy itself against Hyun-jun Shin. Therefore, Shin Hyun-jun’s argument to the effect that the controversy over Shin Hyun-jun has been found to be untrue is not true.

However, I raised the issue as there were several false facts that could damage my honor among the clarifications released by Shin Hyun-jun regarding the controversy about Gap-jil, but the investigative agency was not interviewed by Shin Hyun-jun, but others around him. The decision was made without charge because it was difficult to say that it was the content or that it was announced in the process of refuting the content of the interview, and that it was difficult to believe that it was intended to slander or defam the person.

-Proportle related

In the past, I have raised a problem related to Shin Hyun-jun’s administration of Propople, but the complaint was rejected because the statute of limitations was already exceeded.

However, separately from this, the case that I requested for an investigation was as if I had not introduced the hospital that received the propopul to Shin Hyun-jun, as if he had introduced the hospital to Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the investigative agency has only decided not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see that the expression’introduced’ is an expression that could damage his honor.

2. Rather, after revealing that he had been unfairly treated by Shin Hyun-jun in the past, several people who worked with or related to Shin Hyun-jun sympathized with Shin Hyun-jun and received the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-jun through a media interview. The person did not pay after he did not pay, or by stating that he had committed a fraudulent act of not returning the investment after recruiting investors under the pretense of being a manager of Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the prosecution recognized his claim as fact and prosecuted Mr. Lee for defamation due to false facts in a timely manner, and the police sent him to the prosecution as an opinion of insults. We inform you that a police investigation is underway.

3. Currently, Mr. Shin Hyun-joon has sued the prosecutor for defamation on the grounds that the contents of his disclosure are false, so we will inform you that he will re-state his position after the results of the prosecution’s investigation in the future.

/ Reporter Seung-Hyun Chu [email protected]

< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >