Former manager Shin Hyun-joon refutes allegations of Gap-Jil and Propofol innocent [전문]

Actress Shin Hyun-jun. (Photo = provided by company)

[이데일리 스타in 김보영 기자] Actor Shin Hyun-joon’s former manager refuted Shin Hyun-joon’s argument that the past controversy over Gapjil and Propofol medication was not true.

On the 22nd, the former manager A’s legal representative said in a statement, “Shin Hyun-joon claimed that the prosecution had closed the case without charge regarding the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy that I brought up and the controversy about taking propofol. “It is not true.” “I have never asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy against Shin Hyun-jun. Shin Hyun-joon’s argument to the effect that the controversy over Shin Hyun-joon has proved to be untrue is not true.”

“However, among the clarifications released by Shin Hyun-joon regarding the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy, there were several false facts that could damage my reputation, and the investigation agency raised the issue. It was announced in the course of refutation, and I only made a decision of no charge because it was difficult to see that there was intentional defamation or the purpose of slander.

Regarding the charges against Shin Hyun-jun’s administration of propofol, he said, “In the past, there has been a problem with regard to Shin Hyun-joon’s administration of Propopol, but the complaint has already been rejected because the statute of limitations has been exceeded.” “However, separately from this, I requested an investigation. Is about whether the explanation of Hyun-Jun Shin who said that I introduced the hospital to Hyun-Jun Shin was false, even though I did not introduce the hospital that received the pro-popul treatment to Shin Hyun-jun. “I have only made a decision not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see it as a derogatory expression.”

Rather, after exposing that I had been unfairly treated by Shin Hyun-jun in the past, several people who worked with or related to Shin Hyun-jun agreed with Shin Hyun-jun and did not pay after receiving the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-jun through a media interview. “I filed a complaint against some of these people for defamation, because I had defamed my reputation by stating that I had committed a fraudulent act of not returning the investment money after recruiting investors, pretending to be the manager of Shin Hyun-jun.”

“In this regard, the prosecution admitted my allegations as facts and prosecuted Mr. Lee for defamation due to false facts in a timely manner, and the police sent Mr. Kim to the prosecution for prosecution of insults, and the police investigation is underway for other related persons. I will inform you.” He added, “Currently, Shin Hyun-jun has sued the prosecution for defamation on the grounds that the contents of my disclosure are false,” he added.

Previously, the former manager exposed Shin Hyun-jun’s suspicion of goblin and propofol in July of last year. As a result, Shin Hyun-jun also sued the former manager for defamation, and legal battles of both sides continued. As a result of the incident, Shin Hyun-jun got off the program that was appearing, such as KBS’The Return of Superman,’ and stopped his activities. Recently, Shin Hyun-jun published a book’Woollim’.

Below is the full text of the former manager’s position.

1. I am A who worked as a manager for actor Shin Hyun-jun in the past. Recently, Shin Hyun-joon claimed that the prosecution had closed the case without charge in relation to the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy and the drug administration controversy raised by him, and he argues that the contents of the disclosure he filed are false, but this is not true. .

① Regarding the controversy

I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy itself against Hyun-jun Shin. Therefore, Shin Hyun-jun’s argument to the effect that the controversy over Shin Hyun-jun has been found to be untrue is not true.

However, I raised the issue as there were several false facts that could damage my honor among the clarifications released by Shin Hyun-jun regarding the controversy about Gap-jil, but the investigative agency was not interviewed by Shin Hyun-jun, but others around him. The decision was made without charge because it was difficult to say that it was the content or that it was announced in the process of refuting the content of the interview, and that it was difficult to believe that it was intended to slander or defam the person.

② Proposal related

In the past, I have raised a problem related to Shin Hyun-jun’s administration of Propople, but the complaint was rejected because the statute of limitations was already exceeded.

However, separately from this, the case that I requested for an investigation was as if I had not introduced the hospital that received the propopul to Shin Hyun-jun, as if he had introduced the hospital to Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the investigative agency has only decided not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see that the expression’introduced’ is an expression that could damage his honor.

2. Rather, after revealing that he had been unfairly treated by Shin Hyun-jun in the past, several people who worked with or related to Shin Hyun-jun agreed to Shin Hyun-jun and received the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-jun through a media interview. The person did not pay after he did not pay, or by stating that he had committed a fraudulent act of not returning the investment after recruiting investors under the pretense of being a manager of Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the prosecution recognized his claim as fact and prosecuted Mr. Lee for defamation due to false facts in a timely manner, and the police sent him to the prosecution as an opinion of insults. We inform you that a police investigation is ongoing

3. Currently, Mr. Shin Hyun-joon has sued the prosecutor for defamation on the grounds that the contents of his disclosure are false, so we will inform you that he will re-state his position after the results of the prosecution’s investigation in the future.

January 22, 2021

Mr. A’s legal representative, Apro

Attorney Sohn Seok-bong