Former manager Shin Hyun-joon refuted “GapJil-Prophopol case not alleged, not true”[전문] – SPOTVNEWS

▲ Shin Hyun-jun. ⒸSpot TV News DB

[스포티비뉴스=정유진 기자] Actor Shin Hyun-joon’s former manager recounted the so-called “gap-jil case” which ended without charges.

Kim Mo, the former manager of Shin Hyun-jun, said through a legal representative on the 22nd, “Shin Hyun-joon said that the prosecution had concluded the case without charge in relation to the controversy about Gap and the drug administration that he raised. It claims to be false, but this is not true.”

Mr. Kim said, “I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy against GapJil against Shin Hyunjun,” and rerefuted Shin Hyunjun’s claim that the GapJil case was false. Mr. Kim argued that he was not acquitted of the case, but that he was not accused of raising points that appear to be defamatory.

Mr. Kim said, “There are many false facts that could damage my reputation among the clarifications released by Hyun-Jun Shin regarding the Gap-jil controversy, and the investigative agency raised the issue. “As it was announced in the process of refuting, I only made a decision not to charge for the purpose of slandering me or because it was difficult to see that there was intentional defamation.”

In addition, the charges against Shin Hyun-joon’s propofol medication were rejected because the statute of limitations was exceeded. It is about whether the explanation of Shin Hyun-joon, who said he did it, is false, but the investigative agency has only made an innocent decision to Shin Hyun-joon because it is difficult to say that the expression’introduced’ is not an expression that could damage my honor.

Rather, Kim, who has been treated unfairly in the past, said, “Some people who worked with or related to Shin Hyun-jun agreed with Shin Hyun-jun and did not pay after receiving the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-jun through media interviews. “After recruiting investors with the slogan of “I have done a fraudulent act of not returning the investment,” he added.

In this regard, Mr. Kim, who explained that he has sued some of the officials of Shin Hyun-joon for defamation, said, “Shin Hyun-joon is currently suing the prosecution for defamation because the contents of my disclosure are false.”

Earlier, Shin Hyun-jun, former manager Kim, filed a complaint last year on charges of defamation by spreading false facts, exposing Shin Hyun-jun’s suspicion of Gap and Propofol. Shin Hyun-jun also sued Kim for defamation, and legal battles between both sides have continued. Afterwards, Shin Hyun-jun announced that he had been subjected to unprosecution for no charges.

The following is the full text of former manager Kim’s position.

1. I am Kim OO, who worked as the manager of actor Shin Hyun-jun in the past. Recently, Shin Hyun-joon claimed that the prosecution had closed the case without charge in relation to the controversy over the Gap-jil controversy and the drug administration controversy raised by him, and he argues that the contents of the disclosure he filed are false, but this is not true. .

① Controversy related to Gapjil

I have not asked an investigative agency to investigate the controversy itself against Hyun-jun Shin. Therefore, Shin Hyun-jun’s argument to the effect that the controversy over Shin Hyun-jun has proved to be untrue is not true.

However, I raised the issue as there were several false facts that could damage my honor among the clarifications released by Shin Hyun-jun regarding the controversy about Gap-jil, but the investigative agency was not interviewed by Shin Hyun-jun, but others around him. I have only decided not to charge because it is difficult to say that it is the content or that it was announced in the process of refuting the content of my interview, and that it was difficult to believe that there was intention of defamation or the purpose of defamation.

② Proposal related

In the past, I have raised a problem related to Shin Hyun-jun’s administration of Propople, but the complaint was rejected because the statute of limitations was already exceeded.

However, separately from this, the case that I requested for an investigation was as if I had not introduced the hospital that received the propopul to Shin Hyun-jun, as if he had introduced the hospital to Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the investigative agency has only decided not to charge Shin Hyun-jun because it is difficult to see that the expression’introduced’ is an expression that could damage his honor.

2. Rather, after revealing that he had been unfairly treated by Shin Hyun-jun in the past, several people who worked with or related to Shin Hyun-jun agreed to Shin Hyun-jun and received the salary of a junior road manager from Shin Hyun-jun through a media interview. The person did not pay after he did not pay, or by stating that he had committed a fraudulent act of not returning the investment after recruiting investors under the pretense of being a manager of Shin Hyun-jun. In response to this, the prosecution recognized his claim as fact and prosecuted Mr. Lee for defamation due to false facts in a timely manner, and the police sent him to the prosecution as an opinion of insults. We inform you that a police investigation is underway.

3. Currently, Mr. Shin Hyun-joon has sued the prosecutor for defamation on the grounds that the contents of his disclosure are false, so we will inform you that he will re-state his position after the results of the prosecution’s investigation in the future.

January 22, 2020

Kim OO Legal Attorney Apro

Attorney Sohn Seok-bong

Spotv News = Reporter Jung Yu-jin [email protected]