A Mercedes driver who had a collision while driving while drunk while drunk received a’fine penalty’.
When the reasons for the sentence, which the court fined, were known, many netizens expressed negative opinions. On the other hand, some netizens argued that there was a reasonable reason for the fine.
A court ruling was issued against a female student in her twenties who collided with another vehicle while driving a Mercedes while drunk.
The court sentenced a female student in her twenties, a Mercedes driver, to a fine in the first trial for reasons that it seemed economically difficult.
According to law enforcement officials on the 5th, the Seoul Central District Court penalized a penalty of 6 million won on A, a female student on leave of absence in her 20s, who was charged with violating the law on aggravated punishment for certain crimes (dangerous driving) and violating the road traffic law (drinking and driving). did.
The judge said, “The defendant has no criminal record at all, and the victim does not want punishment by agreeing with a taxi driver among the victims. The other victim did not reach an agreement because the contact information was unknown. It seems to be possible, and the degree of accident and damage is minor.”
The judge said, “If the defendant is a student in his 20s and chooses to be sentenced to prison, it seems that there will be considerable difficulty in returning to a healthy member of society due to employment restrictions. There are economically difficult circumstances in view of the defendant’s age, employment, and family relations. I took into account the points of confession and deep reflection.”
A female student on leave of absence in her 20s was drunk at dawn in March last year while driving a road in Dongjak-gu, Seoul, and hit a taxi from behind. It was investigated that Mr. A had an accident while running about 1.5km at about 10km/h while drinking. At that time, A’s blood alcohol concentration was 0.148%, far exceeding the standard for license cancellation. In the accident, the taxi driver was injured for 3 weeks and the other passenger was injured for 2 weeks.
Many netizens reacted negatively to the ruling.
This is a comment on the 5th Community Theku.
There were also netizens who criticized the results of the sentence by discussing the real name of the judge. A netizen commenting on Naver on the 5th said, “Judge OOO? A student on a leave of absence driving a Benz and drunk seemed economically difficult? This is not it. How should we understand this in common sense? It’s uncomfortable. Anyway, if you drink, you’re unconditionally driving a surrogate.” said.
On the other hand, there were opinions that there was a reasonable reason for the reason for the sentencing of the court. One netizen said, “If you are a first offender, a minor accident, or an agreement with the victim, you will be fined.”
