The teacher appointment test is handled differently by stages.
Applicants for the doctor’s office, accountants, and neglect are not allowed to take the exam.
The SAT is a special treatment with consideration for confirmed patients from the beginning.
On the morning of the 5th, the 10th bar exam day, candidates are entering the exam hall at Yonsei University in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul. Following the decision of the Constitutional Court to suspend the effect, the Ministry of Justice changed its policy so that even corona19 confirmed patients can take the bar exam, which is ongoing from this day. Reporter Hong In-ki
In various nationally recognized qualification tests and license tests, the availability of new coronavirus infection (Corona 19) confirmed patients varies, and there is a growing voice that consistent regulations should be established. In particular, in the case of the teacher appointment exam, the possibility of taking the 1st and 2nd exams was different even though it was the same exam, leading to the argument that for the sake of equity, an opportunity should be given to the confirmed person who was deprived of the 1st opportunity.
The Ministry of Education announced on the 10th that it has changed the guidelines so that corona19 confirmed patients can also take the second appointment exam for elementary and secondary school teachers. Accordingly, self-quarantine and confirmed patients can apply at a separate life treatment center during the test period starting on the 13th. They take subjects such as in-depth interviews, practical tests, and class demonstrations non-face-to-face. The decision of the Ministry of Education was based on the decision of the Constitutional Court on the 4th that “even a confirmed person should be able to take the bar exam.”
In various tests conducted by the Ministry of Education since last year, the handling of Corona 19 is different for each test, and complaints have been accumulated mainly among test takers. The math proficiency test, which more than 420,000 people took, was able to take the self-quarantine and the confirmed person at a separate test center, but the first round of the appointment examination was not possible for the confirmed person at all. Some of the 67 pre-service teachers who have been deprived of the opportunity to apply will file a lawsuit for damages against the government.
On the morning of the morning of the 31st, when the government announced a remedy for medical students who refused to take the national examination due to the lack of medical personnel due to the third pandemic of the new coronavirus infection (Corona 19), an official is entering the Korea Health and Medical Examination Institute (Kuksiwon) in Jayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul. News 1
A confused situation was also produced in the certified tax accountant exam. On the 5th of last month, when it was known that “self-investigators cannot take the test,” candidates were crowded, and when there was a sign of a lawsuit leading to a lawsuit, the Human Resources Development Service of Korea allowed the self-quarantine person to take the test only four days before the test. Kim Mo (27), who took the tax accountant exam, recalled, “It’s true that I was anxious right before the exam because I don’t know what will happen.”
The additional examination for the national examination for doctors scheduled on the 23rd (for those who refused the national examination) also has the policy to date is’no candidates can take the examination. National exams, such as the selection of certified public accountants (February) and candidates for level 5 public officials and diplomats (March), are the same.
Attorney Hee-beom Lee, who filed a constitutional petition in the Constitution on behalf of the first passer of the teacher appointment test, said, “We hope that the constitutional decision stipulating’freedom of occupational choice’ will serve as a guideline in a situation where controversy continues.” Said. He added that “the first confirmed person in the appointment test should also be rescued through an additional test.”
There are also criticisms that the measures to restrict the admission of confirmed patients in the first place were inappropriate. Sungkyunkwan University Sociology Professor Koo Jung-woo criticized that “the state should have allowed them to take the test under any circumstances, and it was only administrative convenience that prevented them from taking the test,” he said. “It raised distrust against young people who are particularly sensitive to equity.” did.
Jinwoong Kim reporter [email protected]
Subscribe to the Hankook Ilbo News Naver Channel
Balance to see the world, the Hankook Ilbo Copyright © Hankookilbo