The power of the people was counterattacking the controversy over civilian inspections by the Lee Myung-bak (MB) government’s NIS, which turned into a political issue. In addition, when the Democratic Party took an offensive on the 16th of the MB government’s temple documents, saying, “We are reviewing a plan to report on the premise of confidentiality” (Kim Byung-gi, secretary of the Intelligence Committee), the people of the pro-Ideal group were the focus of “the National Intelligence Service during the Roh Moo-hyun administration. It is said, “Carry out all the customary information collection documents of the company.”
“MB NIS collects information on customary categories, as it is now”
The National Intelligence Service is undergoing a national audit in November last year. Central photo
Jan. 1999 National Assembly No. 529 Information Lab. Central photo
The People’s Power believes that the MB government’s NIS information collection took place in a customary context. Until the Park Geun-hye administration abolished the National Intelligence Service’s regular access system to government agencies in 2014, NIS employees had regular access to the National Assembly, government ministries, and media outlets to collect information on a regular basis. It is a claim.
The power of the people, conversely, is re-examining the controversy over illegal inspections by the National Intelligence Service, which was raised by the Kim Dae-jung (DJ) and Roh Moo-hyun administrations. Representatively, the DJ government, Im Dong-won and Shin Kun, were sentenced to three years in prison and four years in probation, respectively, at an appeal trial in December 2007 on charges of tolerating and tolerating illegal wiretapping while in office. Among the members of the opposition party, the case of’National Assembly Main Building No. 529′, which was controversial in the National Assembly in January 1999 during the DJ administration, is also mentioned. At that time, the Grand National Party was forced to enter here, claiming that Ahn Ki-bu (predecessor to the National Intelligence Service) conducted a political inspection.
In the Roh Moo-hyun administration, there was controversy over politicians. In July 2009, an aunt of the 5th class of the NIS was accused of illegally accessing 563 cases of personal information of 131 relatives and acquaintances of former Seoul Mayor Lee Myung-bak, who was the then president of the Grand National Party in August-November 2006 (violation of the National Intelligence Service Act, etc.). Prosecuted. In December 2011, the Supreme Court confirmed Mr. Ko’s sentence of one year in prison and two years probation.
On the 16th, Ho-young Joo, head of the People’s Forces, said, “In the previous administration, the case of’National Assembly No. 529′ or’the case where former NIS chiefs were punished by Shin Kun and Im Dong-won’ should be consistently organized and disclosed. An official from the Blue House of the MB government said, “At that time, the NIS has a domestic information part, so it is natural to report basic information on the data on the preservation plan. “Isn’t it a problem because the DJ government committed illegality in the process,” he said. “In this way, the Roh Moo-hyun administration has to close all the documents that the Roh Moo-hyun administration has investigated within the customary category.”
Ha Tae-kyung “I can fire fire even at President Moon Jae-in”
Ha Tae-kyung, a member of the People’s Power. News 1
In terms of the people’s power, on the 17th, it is argued that “the controversy over the inspection of the National Intelligence Service may spark fire on President Moon Jae-in” (Secretary of the Intelligence Committee Ha Tae-kyung). As there is a suspicion that the NIS created an inspection document for former President Roh Moo-hyun’s son-in-law Kwak Sang-eon in February 2008, at the end of the Roh Moo-hyun administration’s term of office, the NIS may have customarily collected domestic information even in the early and mid-term of the Roh Moo-hyun administration. Assemblyman Ha said, “I have to greet people in the Civil Affairs Office, have a hearing, and manage relatives and relatives. Then, do I need information?
Congressman Ha also mentioned President Moon on the previous day (16th) that the National Intelligence Service reported that’there is a possibility that an inspection was conducted because the Park Geun-hye administration did not confirm the order to stop.
He said, “At that time (the Roh Moo-hyun administration) there was an intelligence officer, so (to the National Assembly) the intelligence officer entered and exited. It must have been gathering information, but it is necessary to confirm whether Moon Jae-in at the time was instructed by Min Jeong to’Do not do this.’ “I have an obligation to respond.”
When the opposition party widened the controversy front for inspectors to the Roh Moo-hyun administration, the Democratic Party began to defend. Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Byung-ki met with reporters shortly after receiving a report from the National Assembly Intelligence Committee’s National Police Agency on the 17th and dismissed that “the police officer also banned the collection of information immediately after the Roh Moo-hyun administration (launch), so there was no official information collection from that time.” It is argued that “if there was an individual deviation, the (police) story.” Rep. Kim also said, “The issue of former prosecutor-general Chae Dong-wook (from the Park Geun-hye administration) is a situation that is as concerned as the data was released from the NIS anyway.” “In December 2009 (MB government), the Chief Civil Service Office provided police data to the NIS. He added, “I have no choice but to have a reasonable doubt that the directive has not persisted in the Park Geun-hye administration.”
Reporter Han Young-ik [email protected]