When the contents of the regular inspection report of the Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS), which recorded the leakage of tritium from the Wolseong nuclear power plant Unit 1, were released, the Institute of Technology and the Nuclear Safety Committee explained, “It is not a leak, but a possibility.” In addition to this, the Democratic Party criticized that it was causing confusion with the truth game, and that it would take responsibility if a lie was revealed.
According to the ’26th Regular Inspection Report of Wolseong Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1,’ prepared in March last year by the Institute of Technology Inspection Team, leakage from the spent fuel storage tank was natural after damage to the water barrier caused by the construction of the containment filtration and exhaust system (CFVS) in June-August 2012. He pointed out that it is judged that there is a possibility of leaking into the environment. The inspection team also said, “The results of analysis of water samples in various places inside and outside the power plant, such as permanent groundwater treatment surges, underground wells, non-radioactive drainage systems, rainwater, etc. It confirms leakage to the natural environment due to leakage of spent fuel storage tank or system water (underground buried pipe)…”I wrote. It was clearly recorded that the leakage was confirmed to the natural environment due to a leakage of spent fuel storage or underground piping.
Nevertheless, in a press release on the 18th of the last month, the Yuan Ahn said, “The Yuan Ahn said, “KINS’s comprehensive opinion that no external environmental leakage was confirmed in relation to tritium. According to the opinion, it was KINS’s opinion, and the same answer was given, and KINS’s opinion was not ignored.”
On the same day (18th), the Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety and Technology, where the report was published, also said, “The content described in the Kins regular inspection report does not mean that’external leakage of contaminated water containing radioactive substances was confirmed’, but’gamma nuclides were not detected. It means that the tree tree from the non-radioactive system has been leaked out of the system in the past or is likely to be released in the future.” Contamination is checked by whether gamma nuclides were detected, but he said that gamma nuclides were not detected. In addition, in the case of’leakage of spent nuclear fuel storage tank’, it is clarified that it pointed out the possibility of leakage of influent water entering the collection tank of the spent nuclear fuel storage tank, not a direct leakage.
In addition, the Democratic Party Safety Investigation TF (Chairman Jeon Hye-suk) held a press conference at the National Assembly Communication Hall on the 22nd, saying, “The recent controversy over the tritium leak incident at the Wolseong Nuclear Power Plant was reported to be the truth of the There is a ridiculous situation that is spreading to the game,” he pointed out.
In the regular inspection report of the Korea Institute of Safety and Technology, △Wolseong Unit 1 is confirming leakage into the natural environment due to leakage of spent fuel storage tanks or system water (underground piping). On the basis of the part described as’△’ after use, leakage through the floor drainage and walls due to deterioration of the epoxy liner of the Spent Resin Tank, and the possibility that such leakage may affect the groundwater environment in the site. Presented. Also, if you look at the regular inspection report for Wolseong Unit 4 of the Institute of Technology, △’ It was discovered that contaminated water leaked into the external environment and leaked into the sea through the Turbine Gallery, a non-radioactive groundwater treatment system.‘△’ business operator Judging by the result of leakage of power plant system water and dilution with surrounding groundwaterThe part that says’I’m doing it’ was also presented as the basis for the problem.
Nevertheless, the Wonan Committee, which confirmed this report, asserted that no leakage of tritium was confirmed in the National Assembly’s over-defense on the 18th, and KHNP, a business operator, also visited the Wolseong nuclear power plant site on the 18th of last month, saying,’Groundwater from a waste reservoir or liquid waste storage It is unlikely that it would have influenced me.’ Accordingly, the Democratic Party TF team said, “The behavior of the Korea Institute of Safety and Technology, KHNP, and the original bank, which give opposite opinions on the same issue, only results in confusion and distrust in the people.” “Which argument is true? He criticized him, saying, “The side that has confused the people with false claims should be held accountable for it.”
Problems such as’passive hydrogen removal device (PAR) defect (reported by KBS)’,’tritium leak of Wolseong nuclear power plant (reported by Pohang MBC)’, and’damage of the shielding membrane of spent nuclear fuel storage tank (SFB) (reported by Hankyoreh’s Pohang MBC)’ have recently been reported. It was also pointed out that even though it was revealed by the media, it was revealed that the members of the Wonan Committee, a regulatory body, were not even receiving reports. The TF of the Democratic Party said, “The poor management system that does not recognize the problem in advance and only performs post-confirmation through reports of public interest reports and other licenses and permits, etc., is a matter of doubting whether the nuclear power plant safety regulations and supervision have been properly carried out. He criticized that it is not a precautionary regulation, but that the management of our nuclear power plant is only preparing for tinkering measures after the accident.
The TF of the Democratic Party said, “I will identify the truth and the root cause of potential problems throughout the nuclear power plant safety management system, seek responsibility, and actively prepare measures to establish a nuclear power plant management system trusted by the people.” .
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.