[뉴스토마토 최용민 기자] On the 6th, the Construction Mutual Aid Association announced on the 6th that the contents of the ‘Emergency Countermeasure Committee for members of the Construction Mutual Aid Association, requesting withdrawal of the amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on Construction Industry’ announced by the Korea Construction Association on the 6th was different from the position of the Mutual Aid Association.
Through the press release on this day, the Construction Mutual Aid Association explained that “the release of the press release under the title above is the Emergency Response Committee for members of the Construction Mutual Aid Association, and the co-chair of the committee is the chairman of the Korea Construction Association.” did.
The controversial’Amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on Construction Industry’ made the golf course owned by an acquaintance expensive when the Democratic Party lawmaker Jin Seong-joon and Park Deok-heum served as the chairman of the specialized construction association and the operation committee of the specialized construction mutual aid association in 2009 at the time of the state administration audit of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. It is related to pointing out the suspicion that the purchaser had harmed the union.
According to the Mutual Aid Association, when this amendment pointed out the harm caused by the concurrent appointment of the (professional) construction association chairman and the financial institution Mutual Aid Association Operation Committee Chairman, the then Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Kim Hyun-mi said, “To separate the operation of the association It is a follow-up measure to the answer that I will review the plan to amend the basic law) enforcement decree.
The Construction Mutual Aid Association explained that several things are not true. Regarding the issue of parachute of union officers, the chairman was appointed in accordance with the legitimate procedure after recommendation of the steering committee and general meeting of members in accordance with relevant laws and articles of association.
In addition, regarding the criticism of neglect management, the union said, “Amidst the IMF and global financial crisis, despite the insolvency of numerous financial companies including construction guarantee institutions, there is no single insolvency. 409.9 billion won),” he explained.
The union said, “We maintain a sound financial structure of financial institutions through thorough risk management and business management. We also received an A2 rating from a world-class credit rating company Moody’s for two years in a row and an A grade from Peach Corporation for nine consecutive years. The current management’s arguments for negligent management have no basis at all,” he dismissed.
In addition, regarding the opening of the monopoly system guarantee market and the claim of dissolution, the union said, “The construction guarantee market is already fierce with various construction-related mutual aid associations such as Seoul Guarantee Insurance, Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation (HUG), specialized construction mutual aid association, and engineering mutual aid association. “If the guarantee market is opened to private non-life insurance companies, there is a concern about the insolvency of the construction-specialized mutual aid association due to the acceleration of the departure of superior large construction companies.”
“In this case, most small and medium-sized construction companies with low creditworthiness due to lack of guarantee capacity are neglected by private insurance companies, and construction Mutual Aid Association cannot take over due to lack of guarantee capacity. Pushing can have consequences.”
Reporter Choi Yong-min [email protected]
Ⓒ Delicious news tomatoes, reproduction without permission-Redistribution prohibited